Source · Select Committees · Defence Committee
Recommendation 17
17
Accepted
Review planned 80/20 synthetic and live flying training mix, considering ground crew and NATO alignment.
Recommendation
Synthetic training offers many benefits, but live flying cannot be replaced, and we are concerned that the RAF’s stated intention for 80% of flying training to be synthetic by 2040 will be sub-optimal for both pilots and ground crew. The MoD should review the planned 80/20 mix of synthetic and live flying training, with particular regard to the implications for ground crew and engineers, and the increased need for Aviation Procurement: Winging it? 43 warfighting readiness in view of the European security situation. The MoD should also ensure that the proposed mix is broadly in alignment with the approach taken across NATO. (Paragraph 111)
Government Response Summary
The government stated it is not planning an 80/20 synthetic to live flying training mix, explaining that the optimal balance is constantly reviewed and varies by platform. It also affirmed that the needs of RAF technicians are under continuous review and the UK's approach aligns with NATO policy and guidance.
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
We are not planning for an 80/20 mix of synthetic and live flying training across the system. As set out in our written evidence, the balance will vary by platform, but the optimal mix depends on a range of factors and is constantly reviewed. With regard to RAF technicians, the need to maintain the currency and competency is also constantly under review by the Head of the Engineering Profession and appropriate actions put in place, such as through the increased use of technical synthetic training, to mitigate the impact of any changes in live flying. We can assure the Committee the UK works closely with our NATO allies on this issue, and UK’s approach is in line with NATO policy and guidance.