Select committee: Defence Committee

INF Treaty withdrawal inquiry

Closed Opened 13 Nov 2018 Closed 13 Nov 2018
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
In its Report, the Committee has established a timeline of events, scrutinised the possible motivations for the decisions made by both Russia and the US, and evaluated the suggested ways in which the INF Treaty could potentially be saved. The Committee has come to the conclusion that it is unlikely that the Treaty will survive, as a result of Russian unwillingness to return to compliance. Consequently, NATO will have to find a way to respond in a manner consistent with its members’ priorities. The Committee strongly recommends that evidence of Russia’s re-introduction of a ground-launched, intermediate-range missile system should be publicly presented at the UN Security Council. Government response published Read the Government response (PDF 193KB) Read the Government response The Defence Committee launches inquiry examining the potential withdrawal of the US from the INF Treaty and its possible implications for UK defence. The INF Treaty, signed in 1987, prohibits the US and Russia from testing and deploying ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles which have a range between 500 and 5500km. Last month, the President of the United States announced the intention of the US to withdraw from the Treaty. Given that this Treaty is predominantly aimed at securing Europe, the Defence Committee has decided to examine what the implications might be for UK defence of such a withdrawal.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 13 November 2018.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 15th Report - Missile Misdemeanours: Russia and the INF Treaty on 4 April 2019.

The government's response

Published 1 July 2019.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's position is that Russia is in violation of the INF Treaty and bears responsibility for its end unless it returns to verifiable compliance, with the UK supporting the US and NATO in planning for a world without the Treaty.

  • On verification, it states "We agree with the conclusions of the Committee that there is value in ongoing verification provisions", and says provisions for verification "should be fully considered during discussion of future arms control agreements".
  • On reciprocal inspections, it says they "would be tantamount to a concession to Russia", and that Russia would need to address its violations before signatories would have the confidence "to contemplate a renegotiation".
  • On publishing intelligence, it says it is "constrained by the need to protect sources and collection techniques" and "currently" has "no plans to declassify intelligence material" or present it to an international forum such as the UN.
  • On NATO's response, it says the UK "will continue to play a full role" in NATO's assessment, and that it "will update the Committee on NATO's position following the 2 August deadline".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
15 Jan 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
12 Dec 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
20 Nov 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗