Select committee: Defence Committee

Mental Health and the Armed Forces, Part Two: The Provision of Care inquiry

Closed Opened 23 Jul 2018 Closed 23 Jul 2018
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
We concluded that the vast majority of veterans leave the Services with no ill-effects and that the public perception that most veterans are 'mad, bad or sad' was not only a myth but harmful to veterans. Government response published Read the Government response (PDF 744KB) Read the Government response The Defence Committee is examining the provision of mental health care in the UK to both serving personnel and veterans and their families. This inquiry forms Part Two of the Committee’s examination into Mental Health and the Armed Forces, having reported on the scale of mental health issues in Part One . The Committee will address the following questions: To what extent do serving and former armed forces personnel require specific mental health care for treatment to be most effective, either as a whole or for specific groups? How far does Government provision for mental health services to serving and former armed forces personnel in the UK meet both these specific care requirements and the Armed Forces Covenant’s principle of priority care, including during transition? To what extent are Armed Forces charities covering any gaps in Government mental health care provision? Are veterans and their families aware of the mental health services available and how effective has initiatives such as the Veterans Gateway and 24hr helplines been in helping awareness and access? Are GPs and other NHS medical practitioners sufficiently aware of the needs and entitlements of veterans and their families to provide appropriate advice and referrals? Do veterans receive the mental health care and support they need quickly once they seek help? How does the provision of care and the outcomes achieved for veterans differ across the UK? How are the families of serving personnel and veterans with mental health issues supported? To what extent are government departments, local authorities and charities across the UK aligned and working together effectively to provide mental health services to veterans? Submissions by individual Armed Forces members and their families The Committee is particularly keen to hear from both current and former servicemen and women and their families on their experiences, both good and bad, of seeking and receiving mental health care. However, please bear in mind that the Committee will not consider individual cases or matters currently before a court of law. The Committee recognises that such submissions are likely to contain sensitive personal information and in order to ensure anonymity, the Committee will not publish submissions relating to individual experiences. Instead, the Committee will publish with the main report a detailed review of all such submissions received, which will draw out the key themes and present anonymised quotes as examples of what the Committee has seen. The Committee may also select anonymised examples to use in the report. The Ministry of Defence is content for serving personnel and civil servants to submit written evidence to the inquiry on the understanding that: It is in a personal capacity; In line with long-standing principles as Crown Servants, submissions from those employed by the MoD should only comment on personal experiences and not matters of policy; Those submitting evidence should also be careful not to reveal private information about other people in their submissions.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 23 July 2018.

The committee has published 2 reports, most recently 14th Report - Mental Health and the Armed Forces, Part Two: The Provision of Care (Enhanced HTML) on 25 February 2019.

The government's response to each report

14th Report - Mental Health and the Armed Forces, Part Two: The Provision of Care

Published 24 May 2019.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response to the Committee's report accepts or agrees with many recommendations in whole or part, while stressing that Veterans' healthcare is devolved and that long-term veterans' care is not the MOD's responsibility.

  • On staffing, it agrees with the recommendation and reports overall mental health staffing of 79% at March 2019, against 76% in April 2018. It says pay scales for MOD Clinical Psychologists "are in the process of being realigned" to better match the NHS.
  • On follow-up support for Veterans after discharge, it "acknowledge[s]" the issues raised and is "looking at the best way" to follow up. It does not commit to the five-year follow-up or one-year health check, but says a new single Transition Policy will be launched "later this year".
  • On a mental health centre collocated with the Defence and National Rehabilitation Centre, it "would like to explore this option further in the months ahead". It does not commit to the 12 to 18 month timetable.
  • On regulating charity-provided mental health care, it "welcome[s]" the recommendation and says it will take it "into consideration as part of future reviews" of CQC scope. Legislative change would follow "public consultation" if needed.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 0 shown

No recommendations or conclusions are indexed for this inquiry yet.

Reports

2 reports

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
18 Dec 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
27 Nov 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
13 Nov 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
11 Sep 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗