Select committee: Defence Committee

Modernising Defence Programme inquiry

Closed Opened 6 Feb 2018 Closed 6 Feb 2018
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The report explores how the MDP had its origins in the decision taken in mid-2017 to initiate the National Security Capability Review (NSCR) in response to the development of new and intensified threats facing the United Kingdom. Government response published Read the Government response (PDF 592KB) Read the Government response On 25 January the Defence Secretary made a statement to the House of Commons announcing that the Defence strand of the ongoing National Security Capability Review (NSCR) was being separated, and that a new Modernising Defence Programme (MDP) would take its place. The rationale of the MDP remains that the threats facing the UK have become more “complex and intertwined”. Unlike the NSCR, the Secretary of State indicated that he did not intend for the MDP to be a fiscally neutral exercise. The MDP will be made up of four strands, three of which will look at organisation, efficiency management and business and commercial practices in the Ministry of Defence (MoD), and a fourth focusing on capability and force structure. The department’s intention is to publish the review before the House of Commons rises for its summer recess in late July. The Committee is seeking to take evidence in order to lay out its priorities and expectations ahead of the MDP reporting.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 6 February 2018.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 7th Report - Beyond 2 per cent: A preliminary report on the Modernising Defence Programme on 18 June 2018.

The government's response

Published 1 March 2019.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the Committee's report and says the Modernising Defence Programme (MDP) has set policy approaches and capability investments to keep Defence on track for the coming decade.

  • On the Committee's call to move defence spending back towards 3% of GDP, the Government commits to spending at least 2% of GDP "every year of this Parliament", says this should be seen as "a floor and not a ceiling", and adds that it should "not get distracted by percentages".
  • On the Army, the Government states it is "committed to maintaining the overall size of the Armed Forces", including an Army capable of deploying a warfighting division. It does not refer to the Committee's 82,000 figure.
  • On airborne early warning, the Government says a new-buy "would meet the capability requirement and be cost effective", "subject to the MOD and HM Treasury stringent approvals processes".
  • On the retention of surplus equipment as a war reserve, the Government accepts it has "a certain attractiveness" but points to cost and practicality, saying its policy is instead to give personnel "the most modern and effective equipment available".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
1 May 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
17 Apr 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
13 Mar 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
27 Feb 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗