Source · Select Committees · Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Recommendation 19

19 Rejected

Benchmark UK film and HETV tax incentives against international competitors and review changes.

Recommendation
Twice a year, the Government should benchmark the value and eligibility criteria of the UK’s film and HETV tax incentives against those of other countries. Where the UK’s offer is found to be less competitive, the Government should immediately review the financial case for changing the 102 UK’s incentives in the context of the full range of economic support for the industry, and bring forward any changes deemed beneficial to maintaining overall competitiveness. (Recommendation, Paragraph 75)
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation for twice-yearly benchmarking of tax incentives as a disproportionate exercise, stating they already regularly engage with BFI and British Film Commission, and analysis is produced by Olsberg SPI.
Government Response Rejected
HM Government Rejected
The government has shown its commitment to keeping the UK’s Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) competitive by providing additional support for independent films at a rate of 53% and introducing a 5% uplift in relief for VFX costs as of 1 April 2025. We will continue to work with stakeholders to ensure the continued effectiveness of AVEC reliefs. The government regularly engages with the BFI and the British Film Commission on the competitiveness of the UK’s offer, and analysis of global incentives is produced regularly by Olsberg SPI.14 Government benchmarking global incentives every six months would be a disproportionate exercise, not least because what attracts film makers to the UK is much broader than just our competitive tax incentives, with government investment in infrastructure, funding to attract inward investment, and support for skills development also contributing to our overall competitiveness. There are a multitude of factors to consider when deciding on new tax reliefs beyond return on investment and sector impact, and the government is committed to ensuring that all public money is spent and targeted effectively across the full breadth of the creative industries and the economy. The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events in the context of the wider public finances. One of the major attractions of the UK’s tax incentives, beyond their competitiveness, is the ease, simplicity and consistency of the process. The government therefore currently has no plans to introduce additional complexities on reporting spending across nations and regions. We do strongly agree with the Committee on the merits of having better data on regional spend, and government will engage with BFI and industry partners to better understand the feasibility of reporting regional spend on a voluntary basis.