Select committee: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Recommendation 9

Third Report - Impact of COVID-19 on DCMS sectors: First Report Published 23 Jul 2020 Paragraph 36 Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The lack of visibility of women’s sport this summer risks undoing work to improve funding for women’s elite sport. Cancellation of women’s events is likely to reduce the number of women being inspired to take part in sporting activities. In its response to Impact of COVID-19 on DCMS sectors: First Report 57 this report, the Government should outline how it intends to support women’s sport post-crisis and ensure that, going forward, men’s elite sports are not further prioritised at the expense of the women’s game.

From: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Third Report - Impact of COVID-19 on DCMS sectors: First Report (HC 291), paragraph 36, 23 July 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 14 October 2020 (deadline 23 September 2020).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out support already provided across DCMS sectors, agrees with the recommendation for a national domestic tourism campaign, and on several other recommendations says it is considering options, working with the sector, or would need further evidence.

  • On tax reliefs for theatre and music, the government says it "keeps all tax reliefs under review" and that HM Treasury "would need to assess" any new relief for effectiveness, cost to the Exchequer, wider economic impacts and ability to stand up to abuse.
  • On extending the furlough scheme for the creative industries, it states that "there will be no further extensions or changes to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme", which closes at the end of October, and points to a new Job Support Scheme from 1 November.
  • On museum insolvency, the government says it is "looking at legislative, and non-legislative, options" to prevent the dispersal of collections.
  • On a 'Creators Council', it says it "would need a clear steer from the sector" and "robust evidence" of a gap in what the existing Creative Industries Council delivers, if the sector wishes it to consider the proposal.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error