Source · Select Committees · Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Recommendation 32

32 Acknowledged

Richard Sharp’s decisions, firstly to become involved in the facilitation of a loan to the...

Conclusion
Richard Sharp’s decisions, firstly to become involved in the facilitation of a loan to the then Prime Minister while at the same time applying for a job that was in that same person’s gift, and then to fail to disclose this material relationship, were significant errors of judgement, which undermine confidence in the public appointments process and could deter qualified individuals from applying for such posts. Mr Sharp’s failure to disclose his actions to the panel and the Committee, although he believed this to be completely proper, constitute a breach of the standards expected of individuals applying for such public appointments. The booklet ‘Public Appointments, Probity & conflicts of interest: a guide for candidates’, which candidates are signposted to read, specifically cites ‘Perception of rewards for past contributions or favours’ as one of the issues that could lead to real or apparent conflicts of interest. Appointment of Richard Sharp as Chair of the BBC 15
Government Response Summary
The Government acknowledges the Committee’s conclusions regarding Mr. Sharp and reiterates obligations on candidates and appointees to declare conflicts of interest; planning is underway for the process to appoint a permanent new Chair, and recommendations from the Heppinstall KC report are currently being considered.
Government Response Acknowledged
HM Government Acknowledged
The Government thanks the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee for its recent report in relation to the appointment of Mr Richard Sharp as Chair of the BBC Board. Following the publication of Mr Heppinstall KC’s report (at which time Mr Sharp also resigned as Chair of the BBC Board) we are now able to respond to the Committee’s report and outline the Government’s intentions with regard to this matter. The Government notes the Committee’s conclusions in relation to Mr Sharp. The Governance Code for Public Appointments and the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies clearly set out the obligations on candidates and appointees to public office in relation to the declaration and management of potential, perceived or actual conflicts of interest. These expectations were set out in the advert for the role and Mr Heppinstall KC reiterated them in paragraph 84 of his report. Mr Heppinstall KC’s report outlines at paragraph 2 that Mr Sharp failed to disclose potential perceived conflicts of interest to the Panel which interviewed the candidates. Mr Sharp has now resigned as Chair of the BBC Board. The Board proposed that Mr Sharp stay in post until the next Board meeting on 27 June 2023, whilst an Acting Chair is appointed in line with the BBC Royal Charter, which has now taken place. This will provide certainty and stability. Planning for a process to appoint a permanent new Chair is also underway. The question of what to declare is not necessarily straightforward. It is for this reason that both the codes and the application process are deliberately expansive in their explanation of what should be considered. The Government is grateful to Mr Heppinstall KC for his consideration of these matters and for the recommendations set out in his report (paragraphs 7.1 – 7.3). The Government is currently considering these recommendations, which include proposals about the public appointments process in general. The Government will respond further in due course.