Source · Select Committees · Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Recommendation 28
28
Acknowledged
The public appointments process can only work effectively if all those involved are open and...
Conclusion
The public appointments process can only work effectively if all those involved are open and transparent. Richard Sharp chose to tell the then Prime Minister both of his application to Chair the BBC and of his involvement in the arrangement of a loan for the Mr Johnson but decided not to tell either the appointment panel or this Committee about his actions. The Prime Minister, the panel and this Committee are all integral to the appointment process for the Chair of the BBC, but only Mr Johnson was fully aware of Mr Sharp’s potential conflict at the time the appointment was made. The Government, and all those involved in the public appointments process must ensure that the future public appointments process is not clouded by partial disclosure.
Government Response Summary
The government notes the Committee's conclusions regarding Richard Sharp's failure to divulge his involvement in the loan guarantee. The government is currently considering recommendations from Mr Heppinstall KC's report regarding the public appointments process in general and will respond further in due course.
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
The Government thanks the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee for its recent report in relation to the appointment of Mr Richard Sharp as Chair of the BBC Board. Following the publication of Mr Heppinstall KC’s report (at which time Mr Sharp also resigned as Chair of the BBC Board) we are now able to respond to the Committee’s report and outline the Government’s intentions with regard to this matter. The Government notes the Committee’s conclusions in relation to Mr Sharp. The Governance Code for Public Appointments and the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies clearly set out the obligations on candidates and appointees to public office in relation to the declaration and management of potential, perceived or actual conflicts of interest. These expectations were set out in the advert for the role and Mr Heppinstall KC reiterated them in paragraph 84 of his report. Mr Heppinstall KC’s report outlines at paragraph 2 that Mr Sharp failed to disclose potential perceived conflicts of interest to the Panel which interviewed the candidates. Mr Sharp has now resigned as Chair of the BBC Board. The Board proposed that Mr Sharp stay in post until the next Board meeting on 27 June 2023, whilst an Acting Chair is appointed in line with the BBC Royal Charter, which has now taken place. This will provide certainty and stability. Planning for a process to appoint a permanent new Chair is also underway. The question of what to declare is not necessarily straightforward. It is for this reason that both the codes and the application process are deliberately expansive in their explanation of what should be considered. The Government is grateful to Mr Heppinstall KC for his consideration of these matters and for the recommendations set out in his report (paragraphs 7.1 – 7.3). The Government is currently considering these recommendations, which include proposals about the public appointments process in general. The Government will respond further in due course.