Select committee: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Sport governance

Closed Opened 8 Nov 2021 Closed 5 Feb 2024 6 recommendations 5 conclusions

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 8 November 2021.

The committee has published 2 reports, most recently Ninth Report - Football Governance on 30 June 2023.

The government's response to each report

Ninth Report - Football Governance

Published 26 September 2023. The deadline was 8 September 2023.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and remains "committed to legislating" to put the Independent Football Regulator on a statutory footing "as soon as parliamentary time allows".

  • On a shadow regulator by the end of 2023, it says a formal transition team operating in shadow form "would require Second Reading of a Bill to have taken place", though preparatory work is happening "regardless".
  • It agrees that the Regulator should set fan engagement standards independently of the Premier League Fan Engagement Standard and the football industry more broadly.
  • On equality, diversity and inclusion, it "notes and supports" the calls for further action but says the Regulator will focus on financial sustainability, so wider issues are "best placed to be led by industry".
  • On revenue sharing, it has a "strong preference" for a football-led solution, but says the Regulator will need statutory powers to intervene "as a last resort" if football fails to reach an agreement.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Seventh Report - Racism in cricket

Published 24 March 2022. The deadline was 14 March 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states that it is "in agreement with the Committee's overarching recommendation" that cricket take meaningful action on racism, and says it and Sport England will hold the ECB to account.

  • On linking public funding to progress, the government "agrees with this recommendation" and says funding is already "explicitly linked" to diversity and inclusion policies and plans.
  • To keep receiving Sport England funding, the ECB "will have to meet the funding requirements" in the Code for Sport Governance, which includes agreeing a published diversity and inclusion action plan for Tier 3 organisations.
  • On key indicators, the government agrees the ECB needs to be held to account and "transparently report their progress", and says it "will continue to call in the ECB quarterly" to track progress.
  • The government says it "reserves the right to intervene further" if the changes are not made and implemented.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 11 shown

1: Establishing a Shadow Regulator for English Football quickly is crucial for effective implementation.

Conclusion · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s commitment to establish an Independent Regulator. Introducing a Shadow Regulator as soon as possible to recruit staff and begin engagement and preparatory work is invaluable for clubs, leagues and other football stakeholders might help avoid unintended consequences in the new regime that could lead to dissatisfaction with IREF in the coming years. The final statutory powers, procedures and institutional location of IREF can be changed at a later date.

Link to this item · Read this item

2: Establish a Shadow Independent Regulator for English Football by end of 2023 and pass required legislation.

Recommendation · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government should establish the Independent Regulator for English Football in a shadow form by the end of 2023 to ensure that it can begin initial engagement and preparatory work before waiting for legislation to be passed. The Government should ensure the legislation needed to give statutory powers to the Independent Regulator are included in the forthcoming King’s Speech and ensure that legislation is passed in this present Parliament.

Link to this item · Read this item

3: Premier League fan engagement standards are inadequate for consistent high-quality club interaction.

Conclusion · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Premier League’s fan engagement standard and commend the Premier League for acting prior to the publication of the White Paper. However, the level of fan engagement from Premier League and EFL clubs still varies wildly and we are surprised at the Government’s acceptance of the internal standard as a baseline for fan engagement across football. We do not believe that IREF enforcing an equivalent of the measures in the Premier League Fan Engagement Standard will be enough to formalise consistently high-quality engagement in clubs.

Link to this item · Read this item

4: IREF presents a significant opportunity to accelerate and strengthen fan engagement in football.

Conclusion · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
The introduction of IREF remains a great opportunity to increase the pace of the important work that is already underway at football clubs consulting and engaging with their fans. Whilst clubs should be encouraged to exceed fan engagement standards and pursue best practice, this should be underpinned by the backstop of a strong, independent regulatory framework.

Link to this item · Read this item

5: Require IREF to set higher fan engagement licensing conditions independently of existing standards.

Recommendation · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
IREF, beginning in shadow form, should ensure that its licencing conditions regarding fan engagement are set independently of the current Premier League Fan Engagement Standard. Unless there is immediate and significant change from leagues and clubs, we expect that IREF will be required to set and enforce a substantially higher level of fan engagement for clubs to meet than the Leagues have set themselves, in order to ensure all clubs work to meet the needs of fans.

Link to this item · Read this item

6: Limited progress on EDI outcomes in football highlights need for universal standards

Conclusion · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
The inclusion of concrete, universal EDI measures in the new Football Governance Code is a necessary step to address the significant concerns about a lack of EDI oversight in football. The work on EDI done by the leagues to date has not been undertaken collaboratively and opportunities to pool resources to avoid duplicating work have been missed. We welcome the acceptance from the football authorities Football Governance 19 that they should be doing more to improve EDI outcomes across football. However, while we welcome the standards that organisations have introduced since 2014, the limited progress on EDI outcomes over the past decade means we are sceptical of the claims that this work will now suddenly be done collectively without the need for an industry standard through the Football Code.

Link to this item · Read this item

8: Empower IREF to mandate EDI Action Plans as club licensing conditions

Recommendation · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We are concerned that the Government has ignored recommendations to include EDI Action Plans for clubs and oversight of these plans within IREF’s remit. We believe that IREF would be well placed to receive and publish standardised data on compliance with EDI requirements in football, as well as monitoring and enforcing compliance with equality standards through EDI Action Plans. We recommend that the Government should give IREF the authority to mandate EDI Action Plans as part of its threshold licence conditions for clubs. Clubs’ performances against these Action Plans should be assessed regularly by IREF as part of its routine licence reviews.

Link to this item · Read this item

9: Football organisations must resolve revenue distribution deadlock to secure financial sustainability

Conclusion · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
The financial sustainability of the football pyramid is the responsibility of football itself. Football organisations can, and should, be the ones to find a solution to the current deadlock of revenue distribution. We welcome that progress seems to have been made on a “New Deal” for football and a new revenue sharing model. However, it is clear that there is still distance between the Premier League and EFL. If this distance is not bridged soon, more clubs will be put at risk of collapse. It is right that IREF is given the powers to intervene in the interests of the wider game as a last resort, but football organisations ought to prove that these powers are not necessary. There is still time, before the establishment of IREF, for these organisations to get their act together to secure the financial future of the sport.

Link to this item · Read this item

10: Reach urgent agreement on sharing higher proportion of revenue across football pyramid

Recommendation · Ninth Report - Football Governance · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge football authorities, including the Premier League, EFL and the FA, to urgently reach an agreement on sharing a higher proportion of revenue with clubs down the football pyramid before the establishment of IREF. This should include no increase in the current level of parachute payments from the Premier League but should include an increased, strategic redistribution of income from all Leagues down to the grassroots of football.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

2 reports

Oral evidence sessions

7 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
28 Mar 2023
Oral evidence session
Debbie Hewitt MBE · The Football Association, Kevin Miles · Football Supporters' Association, Richard Masters · The Premier League, Rick Parry · English Football League, Tracey Crouch CBE MP
View ↗
13 Dec 2022
Oral evidence session
Azeem Rafiq, George Dobell, Jahid Ahmed, The Lord Patel of Bradford OBE · Yorkshire County Cricket Club
View ↗
24 Nov 2022
Oral evidence session
Bill Sweeney · Rugby Football Union, Carol Hart · Worcester Warriors community foundation, Judith Batchelar OBE · The Rugby Players Association, Robin Walker MP · Northern Ireland Office, Simon Massie-Taylor · Premiership Rugby
View ↗
8 Feb 2022
Oral evidence session
Anuj Dal · Professional Cricketers' Association, Geoff Thompson MBE · Professional Footballers' Association, James Harris · Professional Cricketers' Association, Julian Metherell · Professional Cricketers' Association, Maheta Molango · Professional Footballers' Association, Rob Lynch · Professional Cricketers' Association
View ↗
25 Jan 2022
Oral evidence session
Barry O’Brien · England and Wales Cricket Board, Gareth Williams · Glamorgan County Cricket Club, Martin Darlow · England and Wales Cricket Board, Mike O'Farrell · Middlesex County Cricket Club, Rod Bransgrove · Hampshire County Cricket Club, The Lord Patel of Bradford OBE · Yorkshire County Cricket Club, The Rt Hon. the Baroness Amos LG CH · England and Wales Cricket Board, Tom Harrison · England and Wales Cricket Board
View ↗
7 Dec 2021
Oral evidence session
Adil Mehmood · Quaid e Azam Premier Cricket League, Basharat Hussain · Quaid e Azam Premier Cricket League, Tracey Crouch MP
View ↗
16 Nov 2021
Azeem Rafiq to give evidence to MPs with questions facing senior YCCC leadership and ECB
Alan Dickinson · England and Wales Cricket Board, Azeem Rafiq, Kate Miller · England and Wales Cricket Board, Meena Botros · England and Wales Cricket Board, Roger Hutton · Yorkshire County Cricket Club, The Lord Patel of Bradford OBE · Yorkshire County Cricket Club, Tom Harrison · England and Wales Cricket Board
View ↗

Who gave evidence

34 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
The Lord Patel of Bradford OBE · Chair Yorkshire County Cricket Club 3
Azeem Rafiq Not recorded 2
Tom Harrison · Chief Executive England and Wales Cricket Board 2
Adil Mehmood · Executive Finance Officer Quaid e Azam Premier Cricket League 1
Alan Dickinson · Non-Executive Director England and Wales Cricket Board 1
Anuj Dal · Vice-Chair Professional Cricketers' Association 1
Barry O’Brien · Chair England and Wales Cricket Board 1
Basharat Hussain · Executive Chairperson Quaid e Azam Premier Cricket League 1
Bill Sweeney · Chief Executive Rugby Football Union 1
Carol Hart · Head Worcester Warriors community foundation 1
Debbie Hewitt MBE · Chair The Football Association 1
Gareth Williams · Chair Glamorgan County Cricket Club 1
Geoff Thompson MBE · Chair, PFA Operational Board Professional Footballers' Association 1
George Dobell Not recorded 1
Jahid Ahmed Not recorded 1
James Harris · Chair Professional Cricketers' Association 1
Judith Batchelar OBE · Chair The Rugby Players Association 1
Julian Metherell · Non-Executive Chair Professional Cricketers' Association 1
Kate Miller · Chief Diversity and Communications Officer England and Wales Cricket Board 1
Kevin Miles · Chief Executive Football Supporters' Association 1
Maheta Molango · Chief Executive Professional Footballers' Association 1
Martin Darlow · Deputy Chair England and Wales Cricket Board 1
Meena Botros · Director of Legal and Integrity England and Wales Cricket Board 1
Mike O'Farrell · Chair Middlesex County Cricket Club 1
Richard Masters · Chief Executive The Premier League 1
Rick Parry · Chair English Football League 1
Rob Lynch · Chief Executive Professional Cricketers' Association 1
Robin Walker MP Northern Ireland Office 1
Rod Bransgrove · Chair Hampshire County Cricket Club 1
Roger Hutton · former Chair Yorkshire County Cricket Club 1
Simon Massie-Taylor · Chief Executive Premiership Rugby 1
The Rt Hon. the Baroness Amos LG CH · Board member England and Wales Cricket Board 1
Tracey Crouch CBE MP Not recorded 1
Tracey Crouch MP Not recorded 1