Combatting doping in sport inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The Committee has agreed to report on its predecessor Committee's work on combatting doping in sport. Report Combatting doping in sport (HTML) Combatting doping in sport (PDF 584KB) Government response Combatting doping in sport: Government Response to the Committee's Fourth Report of Session 2017-19 (HTML) Combatting doping in sport: Government Response to the Committee's Fourth Report of Session 2017-19 (PDF 116KB) Predecessor Committee inquiry : Combatting doping in sport”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
There is overwhelming evidence of the widespread use of performance enhancing drugs in sport. Some are illegal in any respect; others are legal, but are used in suspicious ways. Whether permitted for selective use or banned outright, performance enhancing drugs can have serious consequences for the integrity of sport and the wellbeing of individual athletes. The huge increase in financial rewards for successful sports men and women carries the increased risk of incentives to use drugs to cheat.
Our long inquiry has relied on detailed oral and written evidence, academic research, investigative journalism, and whistleblowers, to uncover this covert and pervasive activity across different sports. The inquiry studied both agencies responsible for policing the use of performance enhancing drugs, and the programmes that, as our report will demonstrate, have used them in questionable ways.
In particular, our inquiry has found acute failures in several different organisations in athletics and cycling: a failure to share appropriate medical records with anti-doping organisations; a failure to keep proper internal records of the medical substances given to athletes; and a failure to outlaw the use of potentially dangerous drugs in certain sports. All of these failures have occurred in an under-resourced national anti-doping infrastructure, which has had neither the financial means nor powers of enforcement.
Some steps have been taken to alleviate this context and the failures it has permitted, but these measures have come too late. We call on those bodies identified in this report to pay serious attention to our recommendations; we cannot afford to allow these same failures to happen again.
What the government said
The government responded on 18 May 2018.
The Government welcomes the Committee's report but says there is "no case to revisit" criminalising doping "at the current time", while it takes forward the recommendations of two commissioned reviews.
- On criminalisation, the Government cites its October 2017 Review, which found "no compelling case at this time" and that it would be "disproportionate". It adds that doping is already captured by existing legislation, and says it should "continue to keep under review" this area.
- It corrects paragraph 148 of the report, stating that the criminalisation work was undertaken by DCMS officials, with UKAD as a contributor, not by UKAD as the report stated.
- On the National Anti-Doping Panel, it states that "UKAD is not responsible for arbitration" and that Sports Resolutions operates the Panel under a DCMS contract.
- It points to £6.1m additional funding for UKAD and says it is working with UKAD and other agencies on the reviews' recommendations, including a UKAD skills and systems review of its investigations and intelligence function "by end of 2018".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 12 September 2017 to its close on 19 May 2018.
- Report 5 Mar 2018
- Government response 18 May 2018
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 4th Report - Combatting doping in sport ↗ on parliament.uk.