Select committee: Public Services Committee

Conclusion 4

2nd Report - Lost in translation? Interpreting services in the courts Published 24 Mar 2025 Paragraph 53
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We have low confidence in the data the MOJ reports regarding interpreting in the courts. The conflict between the reports of poor-quality interpreting in the courts, and the data published by the MOJ, suggest that significant issues with court interpreting may be being missed in the data the MOJ gathers, making it difficult for the MOJ or Parliament to assess the scale and impact of problems in this system and the impact of these problems on access to justice.

From: Public Services Committee, 2nd Report - Lost in translation? Interpreting services in the courts, paragraph 53, 24 March 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 3 June 2025 (deadline 24 May 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Ministry of Justice welcomes the report and says it is "committed to providing an effective and high-quality interpreting service", accepting some recommendations while expressly disagreeing with others.

  • On data, the MoJ "accepts" that its published interpreting data can be restructured, and will create a single publication for it "within a 6-month period". It says it is "not in the position" to publish assessment data by the next quarterly release and "cannot commit" to more data until further discussions have taken place.
  • The MoJ "disagrees" with the Committee's conclusion that current provision is not acceptable and presents a significant risk to the administration of justice, citing a 96% success rate in Q4 2024.
  • On pay, the MoJ "disagrees" with the recommendations on minimum pay rates, longer minimum booking times and travel pay, though it says the Consumer Price Index "will be applied to the new contracts in October 2026 and annually thereafter".
  • The MoJ does not require all interpreters to hold level 6 qualifications, and "disagrees" with a single independent register. It says the Ann Carlisle review recommendations have been "fully accepted" and incorporated into the new contract specifications.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error