Select committee: Justice and Home Affairs Committee

Conclusion 45

1st Report - All families matter: An inquiry into family migration Published 28 Feb 2023 Paragraph 202
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Local authorities are confused by the complexity of family migration policies. They struggle to navigate the varied entitlements of beneficiaries to their support, depending on their immigration status. The amount of funding they receive from the Home Office is linked to the immigration status of their clients and the application of the No Recourse to Public Funds condition adds to their workload. Local authorities cannot plan for future demand.

From: Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 1st Report - All families matter: An inquiry into family migration, paragraph 202, 28 February 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 9 June 2023 (deadline 28 April 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out that it does not think full harmonisation of family entry and stay conditions is "the right approach", and it largely defends existing rules on adult dependent relatives, the minimum income requirement, child sponsorship and visitor appeals.

  • On bespoke routes, it says that "where possible" it uses existing pathways, but that some events are "so critical" that bespoke routes are needed, such as the Afghan and Ukraine schemes.
  • On child refugees sponsoring relatives, it says doing so "would risk creating incentives" for more children to make hazardous journeys.
  • On fees, it says they are kept under review but there are "no current plans" to reduce fees on the route to settlement or for Indefinite Leave to Remain.
  • On the Immigration Rules, it states it has "accepted all of the Law Commission's recommendations in whole or in part" and aims "to consolidate the simplified Rules in early 2024".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error