Source · Select Committees · Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Recommendation 172
172
We also heard that âthe feedback from the voluntary sector involved in those contracts is...
Conclusion
We also heard that âthe feedback from the voluntary sector involved in those contracts is that the contracts have felt quite constraining and they have gone to the big national organisationsâ whereas âsmaller providers have felt squeezed outâ and that âthey were not able to competeâ. 318 Niki Scordi told us that the commissioning processes excluded smaller organisations unless they were able to partner with a larger one. She said that her charityâa larger one in terms of womenâs servicesââstruggledâ with the commissioning process and yet âhad to step in and partner with local organisationsâ to help them bid. 319 Rebecca Robson explained that, as someone running âa small charity without separate IT teams, HR teams and contract management teamsâ, applying to be awarded a contract âwas a very lengthy and complicated processâ. She mentioned âa lot of legal language and very technical languageâ, though acknowledged that she received support from âMinistry of Justice staff and Probation staff, who have been lovely, understanding and patientâ. 320 She added that she also received support from a larger organisation and âif it was not for them we probably would not have secured the contractâ, mentioning various âpoliciesâ that bidders were expected to have in place, as well as âIT securityâ standards. 321 Damian Hinds MP conceded that âprocurement rules, legal risk, and due diligenceâ can sometimes ârestrict the number of biddersâ. 322 The operation of current contracts
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 1 March 2024. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗