Source · Select Committees · Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Recommendation 161
161
While we heard about best practices in the local delivery of probation services, we were...
Conclusion
While we heard about best practices in the local delivery of probation services, we were also told that communication may be difficult among the various local agencies involved in the delivery of community sentences. Justin Russell, for instance, told us that âthere has been a lot of investment in identifying people with a mental health problem when they first come into the systemâ. He told us that âliaison diversion mental health workersâ, who work in âalmost every police custody suiteâ, identify âover 100,000â cases a year. Yet, he explained, âthe issue then is whether that information is passed on to the CPS, the courts and the Probation Serviceâ as HMIP âfound that often it is notâ. 298 They identified causes of these communication issues: as is the case for communication between the Probation Service and its commissioned partners (see section starting at paragraph 173 on âthe operation of current contractsâ), âquite often, people did not realise that they could share the information and felt that there were data protection restrictions, which was unfortunate, or they forgot to share it or did not have the systems that would enable them to do itâ. 299
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 1 March 2024. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗