Source · Select Committees · Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Recommendation 153
153
Witnesses identified best practices in the management of Youth Offending Services (YOSs, see section starting...
Conclusion
Witnesses identified best practices in the management of Youth Offending Services (YOSs, see section starting at paragraph 130 on âborrowing best practices from youth justiceâ) to make the case for the local delivery of adult probation services. Phil Bowen, who agreed that âwe need to ground the Probation Serviceâs organisational locus in its communitiesâ, told us that âwe need to professionalise and localise the Probation Service, fundamentally taking a leaf out of the Youth Justice Servicesâ bookâ. 283 Justin Russell, too, mentioned the operating model of Youth Offending Services, explaining that âYOSs feel locally empowered and locally governedâ. 284 He told us that âthey are an integral part of childrenâs services now in local authority areasâ and that âthey are also tied into a very strong multiagency governance processâ. He explained further: âA typical Youth Offending Service has an embedded Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) worker, an embedded speech and language therapist and an embedded educational psychologist. They are specialists who really know their stuff. They are in the office and can interact on a daily basis with case managers. There is no real equivalent in probation.â 285
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 1 March 2024. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗