Select committee: International Agreements Committee

Conclusion 25

7th Report - Working practices: one year on Published 17 Sep 2021 Paragraph 88
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We therefore ask the Government to provide a commitment that it will not pass legislation implementing any international agreement subject to ratification under CRAG 2010 in advance of our reporting, save in exceptional circumstances and with a full explanation by the responsible Minister. Such explanation should be provided to the Committee in writing.

From: International Agreements Committee, 7th Report - Working practices: one year on, paragraph 88, 17 September 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 8 February 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the Committee's continuing scrutiny of treaties but, on the main structural questions, maintains that the existing scrutiny arrangements are appropriate.

  • On trade agreements, it "does not agree" that more needs to be done, believes current scrutiny is "appropriate in light of the UK's constitutional settlement", and will "continue to review this position" as the first new FTAs are scrutinised.
  • It does not believe "now is the right time" to consolidate its commitments into a formal concordat, saying formalising them would prevent flexible adaptation to lessons learned.
  • On the Australia FTA, it "intends to publish" the final treaty as an unnumbered Command Paper with a draft Explanatory Memorandum and impact assessment "at the earliest opportunity following signature", and anticipates at least three months before laying under CRaG.
  • It "disagrees" with the Committee's conclusion that CRaG is insufficient, considers Part 2 of CRaG "an appropriate legislative framework", and does not agree with the Committee's three specific reform proposals.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error