Select committee: International Agreements Committee

UK-Australia trade negotiations

Closed Opened 16 Jul 2020 Closed 10 Nov 2023 16 recommendations 37 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Government has made agreeing a comprehensive free trade agreement (“FTA”) with Australia an early priority. The first round of trade negotiations between the UK and Australia commenced on 29 June 2020. A trade deal with Australia would be one of the first major trade agreements pursued by a post-Brexit UK. This inquiry will focus on the Government’s aims and objectives, the progress of negotiations, and the possible impacts of a final deal for people and businesses across the UK. It is not yet known when the talks will conclude, but this inquiry will run for the duration of those talks. We have also collected evidence on UK-Australia trade negotiations as part of our inquiry on UK accession to the CPTPP .

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 16 July 2020.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement on 23 June 2022.

The government's response

Published 5 September 2022. The deadline was 5 September 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to its recommendations in turn, setting out its existing approach and some specific commitments, while declining to pre-empt future negotiations on matters such as ISDS.

  • On monitoring, the Department "has committed to publishing a comprehensive ex-post evaluation" of the UK-Australia FTA "within five years of its entry into force", and a biennial monitoring report that will include measuring utilisation.
  • On emissions, it says negotiating GHG reductions in trade agreements would be "neither practical nor coherent", as this is handled through UNFCCC and inter-Governmental environment agreements.
  • On scrutiny, the Department "will make Ministers and senior officials available to privately discuss prospective negotiations with the Committee, before negotiations are launched", expected during the public consultation period.
  • On the devolved administrations, it says its involvement is "already in line with the committee's recommendation", but that "it would not be appropriate for the Government to report directly on their views".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions

All 53 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 6 oral evidence sessionsLatest 27 April 2022
  • 19 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Meetings and visits

Recommendations and conclusions 53 shown

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
In economic terms, the agreement is forecast to have a modest positive impact. The Government’s impact assessment anticipates a 0.08% increase to GDP by 2035—although increased collaboration and positive dynamic effects not captured by the modelling may unlock further benefits over time, particularly in services and digital trade.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 2

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
This agreement is, however, politically significant, providing an indication of the UK Government’s approach to trade after Brexit.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 3

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The agreement also helps pave the way for the UK’s accession to CPTPP. As the then High Commissioner told us, Australia “would have been in a strange position to be championing the UK’s accession into the CPTPP if we had not been able to do an FTA with you ourselves”. The UK Government was also able to secure a commitment during the negotiations that Australia would not seek additional market access or faster tariff reduction through the CPTPP negotiations, thus providing a degree of certainty for those negotiations.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 4

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the provisions facilitating services trade, including those in relation to legal and financial services, which represent a significant benefit to the UK. We highlight, in particular, the guarantees that UK lawyers will be able to practise the law of the other Party, other foreign law (to the extent qualified) and international law in Australia using their home qualification.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 5

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The establishment of a Professional Services Working Group (PSWG) to facilitate discussions on the mutual recognition of other professional qualifications is a positive step, though this is a framework and does not yet secure such mutual recognition.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 6

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should continue to hold discussions with Australian counterparts and support UK regulators in securing mutual recognition. We ask the Government to clarify whether discussions will be needed with regulators at the sub-federal level in Australia; and, if so, what steps it is taking to engage with individual states.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 7

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the improvements in mobility arrangements, which can increase services trade. While it is difficult to quantify their impact at this stage, Australia’s removal of an economic needs tests and skilled occupation list for UK professionals should increase the movement of UK professionals and delivery of services in Australia.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 8

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the agreement’s provisions on digital trade. The ban on data localisation requirements should benefit many sectors, including financial services. The Government’s Impact Assessment did not quantify the potential impacts of the digital trade provisions. Given the importance of digital trade, we call on the Government to strengthen their assessments and ensure that it is included in Impact Assessments in future.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 9

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
Some questions remain regarding the protection of personal data, given the differences between the UK and Australia’s data protection regimes. We ask the Government to explain how it will ensure that UK citizens’ personal data exchanged under the agreement will be protected and offer commitments that digital trade provisions in new FTAs will not risk losing the UK’s data adequacy decision with the EU.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 10

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the investment provisions in the agreement.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 11

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
However, Government policy towards investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)—though not included in this agreement—remains unclear. We call on the Government to clarify its policy towards ISDS, including its position on other mechanisms for investment protection. The absence of a clear policy begs the question whether the omission of ISDS in this agreement was sought by the Government, or whether it assented to an Australian request to exclude it.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 12

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
It remains to be seen how UK agriculture will be impacted by the agreement with Australia and whether the tariff rate quotas and safeguards will protect the interests of the UK agricultural sector, and that of the devolved nations in particular.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 13

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
Individual UK producers may be adversely affected by increased agricultural imports from Australia. We therefore welcome the Government’s assurances that it will be monitoring the usage of TRQs in real time through its licensing system and monitor the implementation of the agreement.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 14

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
There is a risk that this agreement could set a precedent for the negotiations with countries closer to the UK market, particularly with other large agricultural producers, such as the US, Canada, Mexico, Argentina and Brazil. The impacts of the UK-Australia agreement may therefore go well beyond this particular FTA.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 15

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The key question is the extent to which liberalisation in agricultural trade in the Australia agreement will be claimed as a precedent in future FTA negotiations. The Government regard each FTA in its own terms, but there will be expectations created for future negotiations.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 16

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the expert Trade and Agriculture Commission’s report on the agreement and note its finding that the FTA is unlikely to lead to substantive increases of imports into the UK of goods produced to lower standards, including animal welfare standards.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 17

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
However, the report also acknowledges that some goods produced to potentially lower standards will enter the UK, including goods produced using pesticides banned in the UK and, in particular, beef that has been raised in feedlots. It is reasonable to assume that Australian producers will enjoy a production cost advantage over UK farmers in those cases. The Government should continue to monitor the levels of pesticide residue on imported goods from Australia and ensure that they remain at safe levels.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 18

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
It is clear that the Government has prioritised tariff removal over demanding certain conditions on production methods and animal welfare to be met. We call on the Government to set out its rationale for prioritising this approach over available alternatives and to consider further the circumstances under which it may ask for such conditionality.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 19

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The TAC has concluded that the UK’s right to regulate will be unaffected in the short term, but could be constrained through decisions taken by the Joint Committee. We welcome the Government’s confirmation that any equivalence decisions or other significant amendments arising from Joint Committee discussions would be subject to formal scrutiny procedures under CRAG.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 20

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
However, it is unclear what amendments would be considered “significant” and, consequently, be subject to CRAG.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 21

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
Where amendments fall short of the requirement to lay them for parliamentary scrutiny under CRAG—and particularly where the change does not require domestic legislation—there will be a scrutiny gap. We call on the Government to ensure that significant amendments to this agreement that may not engage CRAG are still notified to us.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 22

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the joint FSA/FSS advice which found that the agreement maintains UK levels of statutory protection for human health in relation to food imports.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 23

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
While the FSA/FSS have provided advice on food standards, we regret the DIT has not commissioned advice on the impact of the agreement on broader human health issues. We call on the Government to explain why it has not commissioned such advice.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 24

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
Although Australia represents a relatively small market for UK manufacturing exports, the reduction in tariffs, customs procedures and rules of origin in the agreement are likely to be beneficial.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 25

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
In particular, we welcome the agreement’s liberal rules of origin. We call on the Government to ensure that businesses have support to take advantage of these.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 26

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
While the agreement reduces some technical barriers to trade, more needs to be done. Given the significant differences in the Parties’ regulatory regimes, the agreement should be used as an opportunity to achieve this. We call on the Government to set out its plans for further reducing technical barriers to trade.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 27

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The UK Government has an obligation to ensure that Northern Ireland is able to benefit from any new trade agreements and is not disadvantaged compared to the rest of the UK. The publication of the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill will undoubtedly lead to further debate on this issue.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 28

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
Although there is continued uncertainty over the Protocol, the Government will need to ensure that consumers and businesses in Northern Ireland can fully benefit from this (and any future) trade agreements.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 29

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We also call on the Government to ensure that the explanatory materials on future trade agreements routinely cover how trade between Northern Ireland and the other Party will be impacted by the Protocol.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 30

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
There are elements of the Environment Chapter which we welcome. These include commitments on environmental protection, including controlling ozone-depleting substances, ship pollution and the regulation of marine wild capture fisheries. We also welcome that the provisions in the climate and environment chapter are subject to dispute resolution.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 31

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
However, the disappointment from UK stakeholders about the Environment Chapter is something that the Government should take seriously. Considering that the UK granted Australia generous agricultural market access, it is regrettable that the Government did not press Australia for more ambitious commitments on climate change and that the temperature goals which are fundamental to the Paris Agreement were not explicitly referenced in the FTA. We call on the Government to establish a firm baseline for future agreements which goes beyond the Australia text.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 32

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
We call on the Government to review the provisions related to environment and climate issues and to monitor their implementation. The change of government in Australia and the engagement of the electorate on environmental issues gives the Government an opportunity to revisit the Environment Chapter of the agreement. We hope that this will be taken up in the Joint Committee and ask the Government to keep us informed of developments.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 33

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
Given Australia’s position on coal, it is regrettable that the agreement did not include any references to reducing or reviewing Australia’s reliance on coal. This contrasts with the trade agreement the UK signed with New Zealand.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 34

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The impact assessment states that the agreement should not significantly change the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within UK-based production, but some areas, such as transport-related emissions, have been left out of the calculations, and the potential for increases in carbon leakage is not discussed in detail.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 35

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government’s future impact assessments should cover in greater detail transport-related emissions, the potential for increases in carbon leakage, impacts on deforestation and biodiversity. Trade sustainability impact assessments produced for the European Parliament during trade negotiations are more detailed in this regard.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 36

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
In the light of our net zero commitments, future FTAs should seek to achieve a net reduction in GHG emissions—which may be achieved by agreements on production methods and procurement.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 37

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
Geographical Indications are important to regions of the UK which feel their agricultural interests have been undermined by the removal of tariffs. It is disappointing that the UK Government has been unable to achieve this negotiating aim. After the agreement is implemented, the Government should encourage Australia to make progress towards reviewing the provisions on GIs and introducing a GI scheme. As we have seen in the case of the UK-Japan FTA, when the agreement does not set out the timescale and detailed steps for GI approval in the partner country, there can be a significant delay in obtaining protection.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 38

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The other parts of the IP chapter have been broadly welcomed and the agreement reflects the aims set out in the Negotiating Objectives. We note that this is an area in which continued co-operation in implementation is important, and that for example the UK should continue to push Australia on the Hague Agreement on Industrial Designs, as well as on other issues raised by UK stakeholders.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 39

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government has been broadly successful in incorporating its objectives on procurement into the agreement and we welcome the procurement chapter.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 40

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the inclusion of a dedicated SME chapter. We note that it remains unclear as to whether such chapters have a positive impact on SME trade engagement. Once the Agreement has been implemented, we therefore call on the Government to monitor the levels of preference usage and provide export (and other) support for SMEs as required.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 41

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the chapter on competition policy and consumer protection. We note, however, that the UK-New Zealand FTA separates these out into individual chapters. Such inconsistency is unhelpful, and we believe that consumer interests are important enough to deserve a dedicated chapter.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 42

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the inclusion of an innovation chapter but would welcome further information from the Government about how it could be used for the benefit of UK businesses and consumers.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 43

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
We call on the Government to provide clarity on why it has chosen particular chapters to be subject to dispute resolution mechanisms and not others.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 44

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
We thank the devolved administrations for the evidence they submitted. In the absence of detailed information provided by the UK Government on the discussions it has had with the devolved administrations, it is vital that we hear from them directly. We reiterate our open invitation to the devolved administrations and legislatures to raise with us any issues they consider to be significant.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 45

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
While we accept that the negotiation of trade agreements is a reserved competence, trade agreements will have a significant impact not just on devolved policy areas, but also on devolved economies more generally (even in reserved areas) and interests.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 46

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We remain concerned about the adequacy of the information shared with the devolved administrations regarding matters that are reserved, such as tariff liberalisation for sensitive agricultural goods.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 47

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
We call on the Government to ensure that consultation with the devolved administrations and legislatures is comprehensive, transparent, detailed and timely, and that their views are represented throughout the negotiations, including on reserved matters that may have an impact on them.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 48

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome that the Government has conducted a modelling review to provide a more detailed sub-national assessment of the impact of FTAs. We look forward to receiving assessments with more detailed information on the impact of FTAs on the nations and regions of the UK.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 49

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the collaborative and constructive engagement we have had with DIT officials and Lord Grimstone throughout the negotiations. In particular, we welcome that our recommendation for an exchange of letters to consolidate existing parliamentary scrutiny commitments in respect of trade agreements has been accepted and implemented.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 50

Recommendation · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Recommended (the committee's words)
Whilst we are grateful for the time we had to scrutinise this FTA prior to its formal laying under CRAG, we were only able to scrutinise this agreement after all decisions had already been taken. The Government commitment to facilitate a debate on the Negotiating Objectives if requested by the committee was made too late for this particular agreement. We reiterate the recommendation we made in our Working practices: one year on report that it is important that consultation and dialogue with our committee starts before a mandate is established, so the final mandate can be informed by Parliament.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 51

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s commitment to monitoring and evaluation and call on it to keep us (and the International Trade Committee in the Commons) informed on progress and outcomes, and make any reports available to Parliament by depositing copies in the libraries of both Houses.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 52

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
The UK-Australia trade agreement is the first ‘new’ trade agreement where the UK is not simply replicating the trade arrangements we had as part of the EU, making it an important indicator of its post-Brexit trade policy.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 53

Conclusion · 4th Report - Scrutiny of international agreements: UK-Australia free trade agreement

Concluded (the committee's words)
However, it is regrettable that the agreement cannot be placed within the context of a published trade policy. We ask the Government to publish a comprehensive trade policy before it signs another trade agreement with a major economy. This will enable trade policy to be understood in relation to other policy priorities, to see how Government assesses the impacts and trade-offs of trade liberalisation, to set the Negotiating Objectives in context, and to inform public consultation and Parliamentary scrutiny.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
27 Apr 2022
Oral evidence session
Graham Matthew Davies · Department for International Trade, Ian Shepherd · Department for International Trade, The Lord Grimstone of Boscobel
View ↗
7 Apr 2022
Oral evidence session
His Excellency the Honourable George Brandis QC · Australian High Commission, Kieran Macdonell · Australian High Commission, Kyle Naish · Australian High Commission
View ↗
27 Jan 2022
Oral evidence session
Alessandro Marongiu · Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), Beatrice Morrice · National Farmers' Union of Scotland (NFU Scotland), Nick von Westenholz · National Farmers' Union, Penelope Nevill · Kings College London
View ↗
13 Jan 2022
Oral evidence session
Dmitry Grozoubinski · Geneva Trade Forum, Emily Rees · European Centre for International Political Economy, Sam Lowe · Centre for European Reform
View ↗
8 Dec 2021
Oral evidence session
Anna Sands · WWF, Dr Emily Lydgate · UK Trade Policy Observatory, University of Sussex, George Riddell · Ernst & Young LLP
View ↗
21 Oct 2020
Oral evidence session
Hon. George Brandis QC · Australian High Commission, Simon Smalley · Australian High Commission, Stephen Dietz · Australian High Commission
View ↗

Who gave evidence

19 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Alessandro Marongiu · Senior Trade Policy Manager Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) 1
Anna Sands · Trade Policy Specialist WWF 1
Beatrice Morrice · Political Affairs Manager National Farmers' Union of Scotland (NFU Scotland) 1
Dmitry Grozoubinski · Executive Director Geneva Trade Forum 1
Dr Emily Lydgate · Deputy Director UK Trade Policy Observatory, University of Sussex 1
Emily Rees · Senior Fellow European Centre for International Political Economy 1
George Riddell · Trade Strategy Director Ernst & Young LLP 1
Graham Matthew Davies · Deputy Director, Chief Negotiator, New Zealand FTA Department for International Trade 1
His Excellency the Honourable George Brandis QC · High Commissioner Australian High Commission 1
Hon. George Brandis QC · High Commissioner for Australia to the United Kingdom Australian High Commission 1
Ian Shepherd · Policy Director, Goods, Regulatory Environment and Gulf Cooperation Council Department for International Trade 1
Kieran Macdonell · Counsellor (Agriculture) Australian High Commission 1
Kyle Naish · Head of Political and Trade Policy Australian High Commission 1
Nick von Westenholz · Director of Trade and Business Strategy National Farmers' Union 1
Penelope Nevill · representing the Bar Council, Barrister at Twenty Essex Chambers and visiting lecturer Kings College London 1
Sam Lowe · Senior Research Fellow Centre for European Reform 1
Simon Smalley · Minister-Counsellor (Agriculture) Australian High Commission 1
Stephen Dietz · First Secretary (Trade) Australian High Commission 1
The Lord Grimstone of Boscobel Not recorded 1

Correspondence

22 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

PublishedDirectionLetter
4 Nov 2022 To committee Letter from B Hayter to SoS Kemi Badenoch MP, dated 4 November 2022
15 Jun 2022 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to IAC Chair - UK-Aus FTA Environment Chapter, dated 14 June 2022
15 Jun 2022 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to IAC Chair - UK-Aus FTA TAC CRaG, dated 14 June 2022
9 Jun 2022 To committee Letter from B Hayter to Lord Grimstone on Australia reopening environment chapter, dated 9 June 2022
26 May 2022 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to IAC - Introduction of Trade (Australia & New Zealand) Bill, dated 11 May 2022
9 May 2022 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to Baroness Hayter - UK-Australia procurement, dated 21 March 2022
7 Mar 2022 To committee Letter from Baroness Hayter to Lord Grimstone on UK-Aus procurement, dated 7 March 2022
29 Nov 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to IAC - Australia FTA and Paris Commitments dated 29 November 2021
5 Nov 2021 To committee Letter from Baroness Hayter to Lord Grimstone on Australia FTA and Paris commitments
22 Oct 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Goldsmith to Lord Grimstone on Agreement in Principle with Australia and CPTPP accession negotiations
22 Oct 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to IAC - Australia and CPTPP
17 Sep 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Goldsmith to Lord Grimstone on Agreement in Principle with Australia and CPTPP accession negotiations
19 Jul 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to IAC - Australia Agreement in Principle
11 Jun 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Goldsmith to Lord Grimstone on UK-Australia Negotiations on Agricultural Trade
25 Mar 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone of Boscobel to Rt Hon the Lord Goldsmith QC on the 4th round of negotiations with Australia, 15 March 2021
14 Jan 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone of Boscobel to Rt Hon the Lord Goldsmith QC on an update on the UK’s future trading relationship with Australia, 14 December 2020
14 Jan 2021 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone of Boscobel to Rt Hon the Lord Goldsmith QC on trade negotiations between UK and Australia, 21 December 2020
26 Nov 2020 To committee Letter from Rt Hon the Lord Goldsmith QC to Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP on trade negotiations between the UK and Australia, 26 November 2020
21 Oct 2020 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone of Boscobel to Rt Hon. the Lord Goldsmith QC on an update on negotiations with Australia, 13 October 2020
24 Jul 2020 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to Lord Goldsmith QC on an update on negotiations with Australia, 14 July 2020
2 Jul 2020 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to Lord Goldsmith QC on the launch of negotiations with Australia and New Zealand, 29 June 2020
18 Jun 2020 To committee Letter from Lord Grimstone to Lord Goldsmith QC on CPTPP, Australia and New Zealand FTAs, 16 June 2020

Meetings & visits

1 item

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

DateTypeDetailSource
20 Jan 2022 Formal meeting (private meeting) Not recorded · To be confirmed