Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Conclusion 28

7th Report - Industrial Strategy Published 6 Jun 2025 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The regulatory landscape for businesses needs to be simplified. We welcome the Government’s commitments to regulate for growth, and attempts to offer clarity through the regulation action plan and regulatory innovation office. However, we agree with Lord Livermore that the Government should take this agenda further and we believe that the Government could and should do more. (Conclusion, Paragraph 122) 75

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, 7th Report - Industrial Strategy (HC 727), 6 June 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 12 September 2025 (deadline 6 August 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's ten tests as metrics to assess progress and responds to each recommendation, agreeing in several areas while stating that it has no current plans to change the Regulatory Innovation Office.

  • On measuring progress, the government "agrees that there must be clear measures in place" and says the Industrial Strategy Advisory Council will oversee monitoring and evaluation and report annually.
  • On putting the Industrial Strategy Council on a statutory footing, the government agrees this is an important step and commits to doing so "when parliamentary time allows", with provisions in the IS Bill.
  • On the Regulatory Innovation Office, the government says: "There are not current plans to change the Department or scope of the RIO."
  • On the Prime Minister chairing the Growth Mission Board, the government says the Board is chaired by the Chancellor and the Prime Minister "is not a member of the Board" but engages frequently by other means.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error