Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee
Conclusion 14
7th Report - Industrial Strategy
Published 6 Jun 2025
Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee Industrial Strategy All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The UK has a complex system of public finance institutions. We accept that different businesses, depending on where they are on their journey, will need different types of financial support. However, our view is that there would be merit in providing a single front door for companies looking for government support. (Conclusion, Paragraph 78)
From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, 7th Report - Industrial Strategy (HC 727), 6 June 2025
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 12 September 2025 (deadline 6 August 2025).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes the Committee's ten tests as metrics to assess progress and responds to each recommendation, agreeing in several areas while stating that it has no current plans to change the Regulatory Innovation Office.
- On measuring progress, the government "agrees that there must be clear measures in place" and says the Industrial Strategy Advisory Council will oversee monitoring and evaluation and report annually.
- On putting the Industrial Strategy Council on a statutory footing, the government agrees this is an important step and commits to doing so "when parliamentary time allows", with provisions in the IS Bill.
- On the Regulatory Innovation Office, the government says: "There are not current plans to change the Department or scope of the RIO."
- On the Prime Minister chairing the Growth Mission Board, the government says the Board is chaired by the Chancellor and the Prime Minister "is not a member of the Board" but engages frequently by other means.