Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee
Conclusion 9
2nd Report - The safety of electrical goods in the UK: follow-up
Published 1 Nov 2019
Paragraph 34
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee The safety of electrical goods in the UK follow-up inquiry All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
A number of incidents have made us concerned about Whirlpool’s attitude to product safety. First, its use of NDAs and initial refusal to release a forensic report to a customer whose house was gutted by a fire. Second, its contention that the Grenfell Tower fire might have been caused by a stray cigarette is improbable and questions whether it takes its safety responsibilities seriously. Third, its attempt to 34 The safety of electrical goods in the UK: follow-up deflect blame for fires from the known defects in its machines onto spontaneous combusting tea towels which are more likely to occur in commercial contexts, rather than domestic ones.
From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, 2nd Report - The safety of electrical goods in the UK: follow-up (HC 156), paragraph 34, 1 November 2019
Government response
No government response is linked to this report.