Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Recommendation 12

Fifth Report - Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains Published 17 Mar 2021 Paragraph 60 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We further recommend that the Government a) accelerate its plans to extend the reporting requirement to public bodies, b) enhance the transparency and accessibility of modern slavery statements, and c) develop options for civil penalties for non-compliance. We ask the Government to bring forward concrete plans for the Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains 25 implementation of these proposals as a matter of priority. These proposals should include a commitment to creating a publicly accessible digital depository on the Government’s website containing annual modern slavery statements.

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Fifth Report - Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains (HC 1272), paragraph 60, 17 March 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 10 June 2021 (deadline 17 May 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government sets out measures on Xinjiang forced labour and the Modern Slavery Act, but is "not convinced of the case" for reviewing the Company Directors Disqualification Act and is "not currently considering" a director-led working group or a whitelist.

  • On the Modern Slavery Act, the government "partially accepts these recommendations". It will introduce financial penalties for failing to publish annual statements, with details "in due course", and is "committed to amending the legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows".
  • On a Director-led working group, the government "is not currently considering" one, citing existing cross-government structures, but "notes the recommendation" and keeps governance structures "under review".
  • On whitelists and blacklists, the government "is not currently considering" a whitelist, saying it would be "impossible" to verify comprehensively whether tens of thousands of companies have taken action. It will continue a "collaborative approach".
  • On ODA funding in China, BEIS "agrees that there is a need for greater transparency" in Newton Fund use and is introducing a new digital data submission tool for partner organisations.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error