Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee
Conclusion 9
Fifth Report - Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains
Published 17 Mar 2021
Paragraph 57
Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee Forced labour in UK value chains All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Transparency in Supply Chains legislation in the Modern Slavery Act was important when it was first introduced, but it has not kept pace with changes in business supply chains. The Modern Slavery Act is out of date, has no teeth, and we do not accept that businesses should be excused from doing basic due diligence to guarantee that their supply chains are fully transparent and free from forced labour and slavery.
From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Fifth Report - Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains (HC 1272), paragraph 57, 17 March 2021
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 10 June 2021 (deadline 17 May 2021).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government sets out measures on Xinjiang forced labour and the Modern Slavery Act, but is "not convinced of the case" for reviewing the Company Directors Disqualification Act and is "not currently considering" a director-led working group or a whitelist.
- On the Modern Slavery Act, the government "partially accepts these recommendations". It will introduce financial penalties for failing to publish annual statements, with details "in due course", and is "committed to amending the legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows".
- On a Director-led working group, the government "is not currently considering" one, citing existing cross-government structures, but "notes the recommendation" and keeps governance structures "under review".
- On whitelists and blacklists, the government "is not currently considering" a whitelist, saying it would be "impossible" to verify comprehensively whether tens of thousands of companies have taken action. It will continue a "collaborative approach".
- On ODA funding in China, BEIS "agrees that there is a need for greater transparency" in Newton Fund use and is introducing a new digital data submission tool for partner organisations.