Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Conclusion 4

Fifth Report - Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains Published 17 Mar 2021 Paragraph 33 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We are deeply disappointed that The Walt Disney Company declined our invitation to give oral evidence, and to engage meaningfully with our inquiry. The Walt Disney Company has a responsibility to demonstrate that none of their actions supported oppression or undermined human rights during the production of Mulan. The Walt Disney Company still has many questions to answer, particularly in relation to concerns about whether it completed adequate risk assessments and put in place sufficient safeguarding measures during the production of Mulan in Xinjiang, and why it refused to answer questions before our Committee. Correspondence continues between the Committee and The Walt Disney Company.

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Fifth Report - Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang and UK value chains (HC 1272), paragraph 33, 17 March 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 10 June 2021 (deadline 17 May 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government sets out measures on Xinjiang forced labour and the Modern Slavery Act, but is "not convinced of the case" for reviewing the Company Directors Disqualification Act and is "not currently considering" a director-led working group or a whitelist.

  • On the Modern Slavery Act, the government "partially accepts these recommendations". It will introduce financial penalties for failing to publish annual statements, with details "in due course", and is "committed to amending the legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows".
  • On a Director-led working group, the government "is not currently considering" one, citing existing cross-government structures, but "notes the recommendation" and keeps governance structures "under review".
  • On whitelists and blacklists, the government "is not currently considering" a whitelist, saying it would be "impossible" to verify comprehensively whether tens of thousands of companies have taken action. It will continue a "collaborative approach".
  • On ODA funding in China, BEIS "agrees that there is a need for greater transparency" in Newton Fund use and is introducing a new digital data submission tool for partner organisations.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error