Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Conclusion 13

Ninth Report - Revised (Draft) National Policy Statement for Energy Published 25 Feb 2022 Paragraph 64 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We also recommend that the NPS include language on maintaining the resilience of fossil fuel infrastructure that will remain in use up to 2035, in line with existing Government policy.

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Ninth Report - Revised (Draft) National Policy Statement for Energy (HC 1151), paragraph 64, 25 February 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 27 April 2023 (deadline 25 April 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it has accepted some of the Committee's 13 recommendations, partially accepted others and not accepted others, and is re-consulting on revised draft energy National Policy Statements following the British Energy Security Strategy.

  • On hydrogen, the government "accepts the Committee's recommendation" to update draft EN-1 and EN-2 for the Hydrogen Strategy, saying EN-1 has been updated and amendments to EN-2 "are not needed". It also accepts the recommendation on fossil fuel resilience, adding a new paragraph 1.1.4 to draft EN-4.
  • It does not accept the recommendation on undergrounding, saying that recommending it in draft EN-5 on resilience grounds "would be unnecessary" and "could slow the delivery of critical infrastructure".
  • On a single National Policy Statement across sectors, the government "has no plans" to create one, though DLUHC "will however consider the merits and possibility of consolidating NPSs over the longer term".
  • On onshore wind, the government agrees it is "an important part of the energy mix" but says local councils will remain responsible for applications. It commits to consult on changes to the National Planning Policy Framework.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error