Brexit and the implications for UK business: Automotive inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“This is the automotive strand of the Committee's Brexit and the implications for UK business inquiry . Overall, no-one has argued there are advantages to be gained from Brexit for the automotive industry for the foreseeable future. We urge the Government to acknowledge this and to pursue an exercise in damage limitation in the negotiations. This involves retaining as close as possible a relationship with the existing EU regulatory and trading framework in order to give volume car manufacturing a realistic chance of surviving in this country. Terms of reference: Brexit and the implications for UK business”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
This report is intended to inform public and parliamentary debate and to influence the Government’s objectives as it begins phase 2 of the negotiations on leaving the European Union.
The automotive sector is one of the most productive and successful in the UK, employing, directly or indirectly, over 900,000 people and generating almost one tenth of the country’s manufacturing output. The automotive sector in Europe is heavily integrated, with highly complex and efficient supply chains relying on the friction-free transfer of components across the continent. The sector is highly competitive, with high volumes and low profit margins. UK manufacturing plants have in recent years proved successful in winning competitions for the construction of cars for the European market, where the majority of our exports go. The single market and customs union has been instrumental in forming the regulatory and trading environment which has produced a diverse market with competitive prices for UK consumers.
We conclude that leaving the EU without a deal would undoubtedly be hugely damaging to the UK automotive sector, more so than to other European countries. It would involve the introduction of a 10 per cent tariff on cars and, because of the competitive nature of the business, the shift of volume manufacturing to countries remaining in the EU.
Because mass-produced cars in the UK are less than a quarter “British” for trade deal purposes, we recommend that the Government should prioritise securing the roll-over of existing EU Free Trade Agreements with the necessary amendments to allow UK content to count as EU for rules of origin purposes. New trade deals will also need to accommodate the largely European content of cars built in the UK.
Non-tariff barriers, in the form of border delays and increased bureaucracy, will also affect UK competitiveness. We recommend that the Government should, in its negotiations, place a high premium on securing frictionless trade for the automotive sector.
On the key issue of the future regulatory regime, we have not identified any potential benefits from divergence from the EU, only costs. We recommend that the Government seeks in the negotiations to preserve existing arrangements for the certification of vehicles throughout the EU, whether as part of a Mutual Recognition Agreement or some alternative arrangement. In order to maximise our trade opportunities with our biggest trading partner, and to provide certainty to global manufacturers, the Government should also aim to retain regulatory alignment with the EU regulatory framework for the short to medium term.
We looked hard at potential opportunities arising from Brexit. We found that it is unrealistic to expect an expansion of trade overseas to outweigh the loss of trade to Europe arising from a hard Brexit. Furthermore, any new bilateral trade deals secured by the Government are unlikely to lead directly to a significant increase in investment and jobs in the UK automotive sector. Trade deals are helpful, but not a pre-requisite for improving exports in the automotive sector. Retaining good access to the single market is more important than securing the freedom to secure new trade deals with third countries.
What the government said
The government responded on 15 May 2018.
The government welcomes the Committee's report and sets out its approach to the automotive sector, including a seat-of-policy aim of a bold economic partnership with the EU while continuing to plan for all scenarios.
- On tariffs and a possible 'no deal', the government is seeking "the greatest possible tariff- and barrier-free trade" with the EU, but "we continue to plan for all scenarios", with increased confidence that a 'no deal' scenario in March 2019 is "significantly less likely".
- On regulatory alignment and type approval, market access will continue on current terms during the implementation period, but the status of VCA issued EC approvals afterwards "remains subject to future relationship negotiations".
- On the CJEU, the government says it will end the court's direct jurisdiction in the UK, but will "engage constructively" on enforcement and dispute resolution; during the implementation period the CJEU's role will continue.
- On supply chains and R&D, it cites £16 million committed under the Automotive Sector Deal towards an ambition of 50% UK content by 2022, and says it "will continue to keep these policies under review" as the future relationship with the EU becomes clearer.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 20 July 2017 to 15 May 2018.
- Oral evidence 14 Nov 2017
- Report 1 Mar 2018
- Government response 15 May 2018
What it recommended 14 recommendations · 1 conclusion
1The Government must seek to ensure that it is able to preserve and build upon...
2It is difficult to see how it would make economic sense for multinational volume manufacturers—the...
3Whilst a “no deal” scenario would certainly be damaging to the automotive sector in many...
4Longer journey times, with added risk of delay, plus extra customs bureaucracy would make the...
5There is no argument for a separate set of UK standards: the UK market is...
6In a global automotive market dominated by large multinationals, regulatory convergence is a desirable trend.
7We support the Government’s commitment to maintaining existing employment protections and high standards of environmental...
8We recommend that the Government should adopt a pragmatic approach in relation to any potential...
9We welcome the ambition of the Government to continue to work with existing European regulatory...
10The UK cannot expect an expansion of trade overseas to outweigh the loss of trade...
11We welcome the Government plans to improve the UK content of supply chains, but this...
12Whatever choice the Government makes regarding the future UK-EU relationship, it should make it quickly.
13In determining its negotiating objectives on freedom of movement and subsequent immigration policy, the Government...
14We welcome the investment the Government is making in Research and Development activities, particularly in...
15There are no advantages to be gained from Brexit for the automotive industry for the...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 14 Nov 2017No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗