Source · Select Committees · Financial Services Regulation Committee

Recommendation 178

178

There was some support expressed for the aims of the Consumer Duty.

Conclusion
There was some support expressed for the aims of the Consumer Duty. Phoenix Group told us that it was supportive of: “An outcomes-based approach that creates [an] environment for healthy competition and innovation based on high standards of consumer protection and financial sustainability” and that Consumer Duty is “one such example”. 272 StepChange Debt Charity suggested that the Duty “creates the basis for a common language between firms; setting expectations and commitments about good practice and good customer outcomes across the financial services sector.” 273
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 3 September 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗