Source · Select Committees · Financial Services Regulation Committee
Recommendation 86
86
In response to these concerns, witnesses pointed to the approaches taken by other jurisdictions, which...
Conclusion
In response to these concerns, witnesses pointed to the approaches taken by other jurisdictions, which maintain accountability whilst permitting greater flexibility. The City of London Corporation told us that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) introduced the Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct, 146 drawing on the UK’s SM&CR. 147 However, they noted that: “MAS states that financial institutions should not ‘adopt a check-box mentality in applying the guidelines’ but notes financial institutions that choose not to adopt the specific guidance should be prepared to justify their decision and demonstrate how they achieve the relevant outcomes through other means.” 148 Similarly, the City of London Corporation noted the flexibility of the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), in contrast to the rigidity and complexity of the FCA: “In the UK there are prescriptive reporting requirements with firms required to report annually to the FCA details of conduct rule breaches resulting in disciplinary action. In contrast, the CBI takes a more subjective approach, giving firms flexibility with the requirement being to report issues promptly and appropriately.” 149
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 3 September 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗