Select committee: Finance Bill Sub-Committee

Conclusion 23

4th Report - New powers for HMRC: fair and proportionate? Published 19 Dec 2020 Paragraph 106
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The case for this removal of safeguards for taxpayers and financial institutions has not been made. It is wrong in principle and not justified by the small proportion of international information requests which require tribunal approval to obtain the information. The overwhelming majority of cases which go to the tax tribunal are domestic. It is disproportionate to deny UK taxpayers the tribunal safeguard for the sake of speeding up a small minority of cases involving international requests.

From: Finance Bill Sub-Committee, 4th Report - New powers for HMRC: fair and proportionate?, paragraph 106, 19 December 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 19 February 2021 (deadline 19 February 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government states that it "has accepted nine recommendations and partially accepted six" of the Sub-Committee's report on new HMRC powers, and declines the others.

  • On promoters of tax avoidance schemes, it accepts that DAC6 should no longer be a POTAS trigger, and says it "will consult this spring on a further package of measures" so that promoters face stronger sanctions more quickly.
  • It does not accept the recommendations to keep tribunal approval for financial institution information requests, or to give a right of appeal, stating that the UK "will be unable to meet the international standard" if tribunal approval remains.
  • On unregulated tax advisers it partially accepts the recommendation, stating that, "as a first step", it is "exploring making professional indemnity insurance a compulsory requirement" and will consult on the design of this proposal.
  • On notifying uncertain tax treatment it does not accept a new Stage 1 consultation, but "will launch a further Stage 2 consultation" before publishing draft legislation for technical consultation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error