Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 27

Thirteenth Report - Preparedness for online safety regulation Published 21 Feb 2024 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The government considers that, with the Online Safety Act, the UK will be the first country to regulate such a comprehensive range of online harms, and the Department told us that a lot of what it described as ‘nascent legislation in this space’, particularly around Europe and elsewhere, looked a lot like the Act.63 In developing the legislation and regulatory regime established by the Act, both the Department and Ofcom have engaged with overseas regulators as they recognise that online safety is a global problem and that hardly any of the companies subject to regulation are based in the UK. Ofcom has also liaised with other UK regulators.64

From: Public Accounts Committee, Thirteenth Report - Preparedness for online safety regulation (HC 73), 21 February 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 3 May 2024 (deadline 21 April 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with the Committee's recommendations on codes of practice deadlines, compliance monitoring, the fee regime and evaluation, and disagrees with those on complaint feedback and skills audits.

  • On codes of practice, the government agrees and states that Ofcom "is on track" to submit its illegal harms and protection of children Codes to the Secretary of State by 26 April 2025.
  • On feedback to complainants, the government disagrees, stating that the Act "does not empower Ofcom to adjudicate on individual complaints"; these should go to the provider.
  • On the fee regime, the government agrees. Ofcom will consult publicly in Summer 2024, with the aim of implementing the fees regime in the 2026-27 financial year.
  • On skills audits, the government disagrees, stating that both organisations "already have effective workforce planning processes", which fulfil the intent of the recommendation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error