Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 16
16
Numerous franchised providers operate unregistered, including some previously denied OfS registration.
Recommendation
There is no statutory or regulatory obligation on franchised providers to register directly with OfS. The lead provider retains responsibility for a franchised provider’s compliance with academic quality, financial sustainability, governance and accountability standards. In 2021/22, 229 (65%) of the 355 franchised providers were not registered with OfS. However, there were instances where OfS had not approved providers’ applications to become registered, but those providers subsequently went on to provide courses, as unregistered providers, through franchise arrangements.38 OfS confirmed that it had refused registration to around 20 providers, of which it could identify two now operating as franchise providers. Other franchised providers had started to seek registration but withdrew before OfS had reached a decision on their registration.39 OfS added that it is ‘very interested’ in internal management and governance controls within lead providers, particularly where delivery providers are not registered, and that it recognised it could strengthen regulatory requirements.40
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 11 July 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗