Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 17
17
Government optimism bias and premature project approvals lead to persistently inaccurate cost estimates.
Conclusion
We have examined numerous projects over the years where cost estimates have increased significantly over the life of the project. Optimism bias in government is a significant factor in nearly every project we look at. Another, related, factor is a tendency in government to approve projects before they have been developed sufficiently for there to be confidence in the accuracy of the cost estimate. High Speed 2 has been a case in point. In our February 2024 report on the High Speed 2 programme, we stated that HS2 Ltd had estimated that the cost to complete Phase 1 between London and Birmingham will be £49 billion to £57 billion (2019 prices) and could rise by a further £8 billion to £10 billion due to inflation since 2019. This is substantially higher that the budget of £44.9 billion that was set in 2020. The IPA told us, and HM Treasury agreed, that departments should be using ranges of potential costs until a project is sufficiently mature to finalise a funding package. But, although HS2 Ltd is now using ranges of potential costs, the IPA noted that plans for High Speed 2 had only reached maturity level of 10% when the final business case—the point at which projects are approved to begin construction—was approved.18