Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 13

13th Report - Improving educational outcomes for disadvantaged children Published 7 Mar 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
While the Department is confident in its evidence base for pupil premium it recognised the need to continue building evidence in other areas, for example early years, and on wider outcomes beyond academic attainment such as attendance and home learning.39 The Department said it was keen to have more of an evidence–based approach to how it thinks about schools policy more widely.40 The Department outlined plans to widen its evidence base further through, for example, working with a wider range of What Works Centres as part of the Opportunities Mission and its plans to 30 Q 25; C&AG’s Report, para 13 31 C&AG’s Report, para 13 32 Q 26 33 Q 25 34 Q 25 35 Q 33 36 Qq 26, 32 37 Q 32 38 Q 22 39 Qq 28, 36 40 Q 37 11 consult experts on how gaps in the existing evidence base on areas such as attendance and home learning can be filled.41 The Department also plans to publish areas of research interest. Investing in early years support

From: Public Accounts Committee, 13th Report - Improving educational outcomes for disadvantaged children (HC 365), 7 March 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirteenth Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirteenth report from Session 2024-25

Published 16 May 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government disagrees with the Committee's recommendation on setting out gap-narrowing targets and agrees with its recommendations on funding evidence, early years evidence, school spending data, support for evidence-based decisions and the Opportunity Mission.

  • On setting three, five and ten year gap-narrowing goals, the government disagrees, stating that "Impact will be measured through attainment at the end of secondary school" and that progress is "already closely monitored" through published data.
  • It agrees to re-assess the evidence for funding decisions, with a target date of September 2025. A review of the schools national funding formula "will inform decisions on the NFF and pupil premium for 2026-27" onwards.
  • On school spending data, it agrees (target December 2027) and is "reviewing options" to improve pupil premium reporting, including "potential digital solutions by Academic Year 2027-28".
  • On early years evidence, it agrees (target April 2026) and says it will work with the Education Endowment Foundation to monitor the impact of the Early Years Pupil Premium uplift through an independent evaluation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error