Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 17
17
Probation services already operating at 102% capacity, unable to absorb additional workload
Recommendation
HMPPS told us that probation officers and probation services officers were already dealing with a workload equivalent to 102% of capacity.60 We raised the potential impact on probation services if the sentencing review recommends alternatives to custody, possibly requiring more support from the probation service. HMPPS commented that if more people shift from short custody into probation this would need more support from probation officers. It told us that additional work could not be given to probation services without establishing what probation services would not be doing in future. It told us that “the lowest rung” of the probation caseload is those people who would only receive community sentence, not a prison sentence, and that there is no evidence that intensive supervision is very helpful for these people.61 50 C&AG’s Report, para 3.8 51 Q 134 52 Q 45 53 Q 44 54 C&AG’s Report, para 1.25 55 C&AG’s Report, para 1.24 56 C&AG’s Report, para 3.8 57 Q 47 58 Q 50 59 Qq 49–50 60 Q 118 61 Qq 119–121 13 2 Costs and impacts of the prison crisis Costs of the crisis
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 16 May 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗