Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Conclusion 8
15th Report - Prison estate capacity
Published 14 Mar 2025
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Prison estate capacity All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We asked HMPPS why the costs of its Rapid Deployment Cells (RDCs) had risen so significantly.25 HMPPS said that increases were due to three factors: design changes as it developed its understanding of what was needed; site–specific costs due to unforeseen issues such as asbestos; and nutrient neutrality regulations, which require it to offset the impact of projects on the environment.26 We asked MoJ if it had a maximum price that it was willing to pay for a prison place.27 MoJ explained that, while there have been some instances where it had not progressed projects because of cost, there is no specific point at which it would regard a project as too expensive. It told us that decisions to progress projects depend on several factors such as how urgent the need for additional capacity is and how quickly places can be delivered.28 18 C&AG’s Report, para 1.15 19 Qq 23–27 20 Qq 11–13 21 Q 8 22 Q 13 23 Q 23 24 Qq 13–18 25 Q 30 26 Q 31 27 Qq 33,34 28 Q 34 10 Delivering the remaining 14,000 prison places
From: Public Accounts Committee, 15th Report - Prison estate capacity (HC 366), 14 March 2025
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 16 May 2025.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government agrees with most of the Committee's recommendations on prison capacity, disagrees with two, and reports several as implemented in April 2025.
- On lessons learned, HMPPS is "committed to reviewing" its Lessons Learned Strategy and Log on a minimum bi-annual basis, with the next review point in October 2025.
- It disagrees with the recommendation for a business case on the maintenance backlog, stating that future investment decisions and business cases "will depend on the outcome of the ongoing Spending Review round".
- It disagrees with the recommendation on evaluating the impact of capacity pressures on risk assessments for new prisoners, stating "it is not possible to evaluate the impact" but that HMPPS will continue to monitor their completeness.
- It agrees to update the Committee within two months of the Sentencing Review's next phase on the forecast prison place shortage, the maintenance backlog and fire safety.