Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 7

7 Deferred

Department learned lessons, improved loan management staffing and governance.

Conclusion
We therefore asked the Department what it would have done differently if it had to set up a similar loan scheme again. It told us that it had tried to build in lessons learned as it went through the process. For example, it had been optimistic about the number of staff and the capability it required to manage the loans. It had since, therefore, increased significantly the resources in its loan team, with recruitment almost complete by July 2024, and had embedded in this team digital, data and technology expertise, which it previously had not had. It had also clarified the scheme’s governance arrangements in July 2024 and codified its processes. The Department emphasised that it was now in a solid place with regard to 4 C&AG’s Report, paras 14, 15, 17 and 21 5 C&AG’s Report, para 6 6 Qq 7, 9 9 the scheme’s objectives, governance and expertise, and had managed the scheme in a solid and effective way. It was cautiously optimistic about the effectiveness of its management model going forward.7
Government Response Summary
The department will be undertaking a strategic review of its loan book management this financial year, including an external evaluation of the current operating model and alternative management options.
Government Response Deferred
HM Government Deferred
1.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: March 2026 1.2 DCMS’s Loan Book management refers to loans issued to selected organisations as part of the broader Culture Recovery Fund (CRF) and Sport Survival Package (SSP) COVID- 19 interventions. These packages were originally designed to ensure no sport or cultural organisation would go insolvent as a result of COVID-19 restrictions, with loans awarded to organisations able to demonstrate eligibility and financial need. The loan terms included a repayment holiday, allowing organisations time to recover before repayments commenced. 15 This time also allowed the department to enhance its capability and capacity to manage the loan book. 1.3 The Loan Book Management programme has two clear objectives, which are followed by all delivery partners. The financial objective is always considered first: • Maximising financial return to the Exchequer (the “financial objective”); whilst • Balancing the department's long-standing and enduring interest in protecting the long-term sustainability of the country's sporting and cultural sectors and the benefits they generate (the “policy objective”). 1.4 The department took steps to ensure it had a robust model in place, having analysed a range of options and taken external advice. This has ensured that the department has received 97% of the repayments scheduled at the date of the NAO report, which demonstrates the positive performance of the department’s loan book management approach. 1.5 The department will be undertaking a strategic review of its loan book management in this financial year. This will involve a review of the efficiency and effectiveness of the current operating model, including an external evaluation. The review will consider alternative management options and is further referenced in the department’s response to recommendation 3.