Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 2

22nd Report - Government’s support for biomass Published 25 Apr 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Recommendation (the committee's words)
DESNZ has not made clear how its plans to strengthen the sustainability rules might work in practice. In its Biomass Strategy, published in August 2023, DESNZ committed to develop and consult on a common sustainability framework which could be applied to new future biomass policies and schemes across different sectors of the economy. It also committed to considering whether it should introduce a requirement that, to meet the standards for the land criteria, 100% of woody biomass should be sustainable rather than the current 70%. DESNZ acknowledges that a new approach to assurance is needed and that increasing the stringency of rules around sustainability may need an increase in resources to monitor compliance. Ofgem’s investigation into Drax, together with the detailed follow up work, indicates the level of resources which may be required to provide a higher level of assurance. Ofgem’s ability to provide assurance 4 over higher standards of sustainability will depend on increases in financial support from DESNZ and HM Treasury. Given the significant public concerns raised in relation to the findings of the KPMG review commissioned by Drax into its Canadian supply chain processes and reporting practices, from the forests of Western Canada to the power station in North Yorkshire, the full report should be made available for Parliamentary scrutiny. recommendation a. DESNZ should estimate the cost and test the effectiveness of its proposals for monitoring compliance against an increased threshold for sustainability; b. DESNZ and HM Treasury should, working with Ofgem, consider the resource implications for Ofgem of introducing and then running a new oversight regime. DESNZ should set out, and publish, the steps it is taking to make sure it has the confidence that all the fuel burned at Drax is sustainably sourced; and c. Drax should provide the Committee with the full report as produced following the review commissioned from KPMG of its Canadian supply chain processes a

From: Public Accounts Committee, 22nd Report - Government’s support for biomass (HC 715), 25 April 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty-second Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty-second report from Session 2024-25

Published 10 July 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with most of the Committee's recommendations on biomass, with target implementation dates between autumn 2025 and spring 2027, but disagrees on adding BECCS transition clauses to the Drax contract and says the KPMG reports are not a matter for it.

  • On assessing its sustainability assurance approach, the government agrees, with a target date of autumn 2025, and says it is reflecting on evaluation and audit processes for the new Drax contract. It states the Ofgem investigation is evidence "the current assurance regime is working well".
  • On a new oversight regime, the government agrees (target December 2025) and is "considering options to publish" its sustainability enforcement plans under the new Drax contract. It says any additional Ofgem oversight responsibilities "must be considered in the round".
  • The government disagrees with adding clauses to the transitional support agreement to prompt Drax to transition to BECCS. It says such requirements would expose the government to "an unacceptable level of legal risk" until a full assessment of power BECCS is finalised.
  • On the KPMG reports, the government says "This is not a matter for the government to consider", as the reports remain Drax's property and it is for Drax to decide whether to release them.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error