Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 6

29th Report - Condition of Government property Published 11 Jun 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Cabinet Office’s oversight of government property risks being ineffective due to duplication of roles. The OGP is responsible for the overall strategy for non–office property across government, whereas the Government Property Agency (GPA) is responsible for office related strategy. 7 The OGP sits within the Cabinet Office and the GPA is one of the Cabinet Office’s Executive Agencies, and we are not convinced of the need for two separate organisations, given both sit within the Cabinet Office departmental group. The new National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority, responsible for infrastructure strategy, jointly reports to the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury. Strategy implementation and operational management are split across departments and their ALBs. For example, NHS Property Services is responsible for the primary care estate (initial points of contact for patients, such as GP practices, pharmacies and dental clinics), while currently NHS England is responsible for the secondary care estate (for example, hospitals and specialist clinics). The existence of these various organisations across government risks duplication of effort and inefficiencies. Additionally, while the OGP has responsibility for overseeing property strategy, it does not have the levers to support improvements, which raises the concern that it cannot gain sufficient traction. The Cabinet Office says it is carrying out a review of its structure to remove duplication and inefficiency. recommendation The Cabinet Office should write to the Committee, as soon as practicable, to provide an update on its review of the effectiveness of its oversight of government property. The update should include any actions it is taking to strip out duplicate roles, and give specific consideration to the need for two property organisations within the Cabinet Office departmental group. 8 1 The property maintenance backlog and its impact Introduction

From: Public Accounts Committee, 29th Report - Condition of Government property (HC 641), 11 June 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty-ninth Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026 (deadline 11 August 2025).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty ninth report from Session 2024-26

Published 18 September 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states that it agrees with the Committee's recommendations in each area of the report, with target implementation dates ranging from autumn 2025 to the 2027-28 annual reports and accounts.

  • On reporting backlogs in annual reports and accounts, the government agrees, but says this is "Subject to the Cabinet Office confirming the standard definition and calculation methods"; HM Treasury will "aim to make changes" to the FReM by November 2026.
  • On risk analysis in Strategic Asset Management Plans, the government agrees (target: autumn 2026). The Cabinet Office intends to strengthen the position on strategic or major risks as an initial step, then to consult departments on how far explicit portfolio risk analysis "is practicable".
  • The Office of Government Property will write to the Committee by April 2026 on support to departments, but states that central support "will be limited" unless departments support the centre to act on their behalf and pool resources.
  • The Cabinet Office will write to the Committee no later than October 2025 on longer-term maintenance planning, and by July 2026 on improvement and assessment of departmental plans.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error