Conclusion 4

The cross-government response to tackling the exploitation of migrant workers has been insufficient and, within this, the Home Office’s response has been slow and ineffective. Concerns about the exploitation of migrant workers are well understood and have been raised previously by the Committee. Tackling this exploitation needs a cross-government response to prevent and detect abuses, and take enforcement action when exploitation is identified. The Home Office works with other bodies including the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority, which focuses on exploitation and labour market abuses, sector regulators and departments such as HM Revenue and Customs. Within this, the Home Office has not done enough to fulfil its responsibilities. It has not taken sufficient action to prevent exploitation in applicants’ home countries and identify bogus agents, relying on sponsors complying with immigration rules. Further, it is not clear whether arrangements to safeguard care workers whose employers’ sponsor licence has been revoked—around 34,000 people—are working effectively. The Home Office works with local authorities but was unaware of how arrangements were working in practice or the adequacy of support provided. We are also not 5 convinced by the Home Office’s approach to meeting its responsibility for preventing modern slavery, illustrated by it not knowing how many people with Skilled Worker visas had been referred as potential victims. recommendation The Home Office should work with relevant government bodies to establish an agreed response to tackling exploitation risks and consequences. This should include clear working arrangements for tackling labour market exploitation and abuses; an evaluation of how the regional partnerships are working and the effectiveness of channels for reporting abuses; and explicit arrangements to safeguard migrants when their sponsor’s licence is revoked.