Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 10
10
Accepted
Government lacks evidence to determine optimal financing models for infrastructure projects
Recommendation
The government does not have an evidence base upon which to judge which financing models are best suited for particular projects and as such, the government may not be achieving value for money on some infrastructure projects.17 In addition, the absence of an evaluation means that government cannot make the necessary assessments to determine the appropriateness of financing models. As a result, there is a lack of clarity for investors on what projects the government is willing to support and what financing approach they may take in each case.18
Government Response Summary
The government states the recommendation is implemented, asserting that its 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy, Green Book appraisals, and NISTA's advice already provide the framework for selecting financing models based on value for money and project specifics.
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
2.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented 2.2 The government’s 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy sets out several of the main basic models available to deploy private finance into projects, many of which have been and continue to be highly successful in delivering infrastructure investment. 2.3 In general, while some model archetypes might be suitable for different markets or different asset types, the selection of a financing model will be highly dependent on the specifics of a given project (e.g. the risk profile, maturity of technology, and so on). The Treasury's preferred model for any type of infrastructure project is the one that offers the best value for money, and it appraises proposals on a case-by-case basis using the Green Book. 2.4 Contracting authorities should design their model with suitable provisions and appropriate risk transfer based on the specific project at hand ensuring value for money. This means that the appropriate model will often be a bespoke version of an existing basic model. NISTA provides advice and guidance to contracting authorities, and the Treasury teams and NISTA work together to implement the 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy including through considering how private finance can deliver the government’s infrastructure priorities. 2.5 The Treasury evaluates the costs and benefits of alternative options – including financing models – as part of the Business Case process to identify the preferred model for each project and to ensure value for money is achieved for each infrastructure investment.