Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 6
39th Report - Government’s use of private finance for infrastructure
Published 11 Jul 2025
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Government’s use of private finance for infrastructure All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Poor contract management is impacting the quality and condition of PFI assets being handed back to the public sector. Public bodies are due to pay £136 billion in unitary charges up until 2052–53 for all 665 ongoing PFI contracts, with half of these contracts set to expire within the next decade. However, ongoing challenges around PFI asset condition—for example in schools—need careful management to ensure only quality assets are handed back. We were pleased to hear about the hard work that NISTA’s PFI centre of excellence is undertaking to manage these issues, including the use of toolkits and experts. We understand that some issues with contract management stem from the assumption that PFI would be self-monitoring, with private sector providers reviewing their own performance and reporting back to the public body on the other side of the contract. This rarely happened in practice and should not preclude public bodies from robust contract management to ensure that private sector providers comply with their contractual obligations. The Treasury and NISTA say that the earlier PFI contracts did not have clear provisions for the condition of assets on their return to the public sector at the end of the contract. To support public bodies in managing these contracts, NISTA has published an asset condition playbook, rolled out technology and other toolkits to support contract managers. The lessons here apply equally to any other infrastructure financing model. recommendation The Treasury should set out how it will improve central support for public bodies in assessing the state of their privately financed assets and enforcing contractual mechanisms to ensure that well-maintained assets are returned to the public sector. 6 1 Government’s infrastructure strategy Introduction
From: Public Accounts Committee, 39th Report - Government’s use of private finance for infrastructure (HC 821), 11 July 2025
Government response
Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirty-ninth Report of Session 2024-26
The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026 (deadline 11 September 2025).
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirty-ninth report from Session 2024-26
Published 15 October 2025.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government states that it "agrees with the Committee's recommendation" in each of the recommendations set out in the response, describing some as implemented and others as having target implementation dates between October 2026 and May 2027.
- On the pipeline, the government says the recommendation is implemented, citing the Infrastructure Pipeline published by NISTA in July 2025, with updates "every 6 months", and NISTA has written to the Committee alongside the Treasury Minute.
- On financing models, the government agrees but says the preferred model is "the one that offers the best value for money", appraised "on a case-by-case basis" using the Green Book.
- On a central database, the government agrees with a target implementation date of May 2027. It will expand the Pipeline over time and "explore whether" the additional information sits best there or in a parallel product; the Pipeline would not include legacy PFI or commercially sensitive information.
- On risk allocation, the government agrees with a target date of May 2026, saying the Treasury and NISTA "will set out further guidance by May 2026" on contract and performance management and on resetting infrastructure projects.