Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Conclusion 19
2nd Report - Transforming Courts and Tribunals: progress review
Published 5 Nov 2019
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Transforming courts and tribunals: progress review inquiry All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Transform Justice told us that most testing done by HMCTS is ‘process-based’ and does not look at the outcomes. We explored this issue in the context of video hearings. The Bar Council criticised the scope of the pilot for video testing, while the Law Society told us of research in the USA that found “where judges and decision-makers engage with people over a video link, they have a lower degree of empathy than when dealing with someone face-to-face.”44 Similarly, the Equality and Human Rights Commission flagged several concerns about the use of video hearings increasing unfairness, limiting access to justice and potentially impacting court outcomes.45
From: Public Accounts Committee, 2nd Report - Transforming Courts and Tribunals: progress review (HC 27), 5 November 2019
Government response
No government response is linked to this report.