Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 20

20

We asked about the Bank’s decision to adapt the programme governance arrangements as it moved...

Conclusion
We asked about the Bank’s decision to adapt the programme governance arrangements as it moved from planning into delivery, which the Bank explained was driven by “learning by doing”.42 Initial programme oversight was through the NED-led RTGS Renewal Committee (RRC), which drew on NEDs’ commercial and procurement experience. For delivery, the Bank replaced the RRC with an executive-led Renewal Executive Board (REB), which it felt would have closer sight of the programme to make necessary strategic and operational decisions. The REB included the Chief Operating Officer, who provided support for commercial negotiations and managing dependencies with other parts of the Bank, and it was also attended by Accenture. The Bank told us that the REB met more frequently as delivery intensified, weekly during the final stages, to maintain close oversight of progress.43 40 C&AG’s Report, Paras 23 and 2.2; Qq 33-34 41 C&AG’s Report, para 2.25 42 Q 22 43 Qq 15, 17-18 and 22-23; C&AG’s Report, para 2.21 13
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 4 August 2026. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗