Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Conclusion 24
8th Report - Northern Powerhouse Rail
Published 1 Jul 2026
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Northern Powerhouse Rail All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Treasury’s Northern Growth Envoy acknowledged that “it is really hard to agree stuff across the north of England” and that “there are really difficult decisions still to come”.50 However, he said he was confident in the approach they were taking because they had already tested it through the work to agree the programme sequencing and overall approach with the mayors. He expected the approach would be helpful because it provides transparency to everyone about the consequences of decisions.51 This was supported by written evidence from the Liverpool–Manchester Railway Board, which highlighted the government’s commitment to joint working with mayoral combined authorities and “holistic cross-government approach” to programme governance. It said this indicated the programme was being set up for success.52 Working with national and local transport plans and priorities
From: Public Accounts Committee, 8th Report - Northern Powerhouse Rail (HC 97), 1 July 2026
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 14 September 2026 (deadline 1 September 2026).