Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 5

51st Report - The UK’s F-35 stealth fighter capability Published 31 Oct 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Department has taken a narrow and short-term approach to management and costs and has failed to realistically appraise the programme’s whole-life cost. The Department acknowledges that it reduced the pace of aircraft deliveries to make short-term financial savings at multiple points in the programme, notably in 2010. In 2021 the Department decided to pause building a sovereign facility for assuring that aircraft retained their stealth capabilities, which is required for its freedom of action policy. The Department similarly delayed providing 809 Naval Air Squadron’s infrastructure by 6 years, increasing costs by almost £100 million. It did so despite knowing it would cost more money in the long-term and create a gap in capability. The Department also failed for many years to significantly update its public whole-life cost, which hardly increased from its 2013 estimate of £18.425 billion covering the first 48 aircraft to the then out of service date of 2048. In response to the 2025 National Audit Office report the MoD published a whole-life cost of almost £57 billion for all 138 aircraft to the new out of service date of 2069. But this still does not include non-equipment costs such as personnel, fuel and infrastructure which are included in the NAO estimate of £71 billion. recommendation The Department should: a. set out in its upcoming Defence Investment Plan the expected long-term impact on costs and capability of any short-term savings measures, on both the F-35 and other major programmes, and b. build on its recent whole-life cost analysis by including all relevant non-equipment costs to give a more complete through-life cost forecast of the programme. 4

From: Public Accounts Committee, 51st Report - The UK’s F-35 stealth fighter capability (HC 1232), 31 October 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifty-first Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026 (deadline 31 December 2025).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifty-first report from Session 2024-26

Published 19 January 2026.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with most of the Committee's recommendations on the F-35, disagreeing on a F-35-specific workforce plan and on updating the Committee on Dual Capable Aircraft costs.

  • On Full Operating Capability, the government agrees that criteria should take account of capability gaps and sustainment, with a target implementation date of November 2026.
  • It agrees to write to the Committee by 30 April 2026 on increasing F-35 availability, saying the longer timeline is needed to draw on lessons from Carrier Strike Group 25.
  • It disagrees with producing an F-35-specific recruitment and retention plan and will instead address the issue through the "ongoing RAF People Campaign".
  • On RAF Marham accommodation, it will write by 31 May 2026 to advise "whether" the current timescale can be brought forward, after infrastructure requirements are reassessed following the Defence Investment Plan.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error