Recommendation 4

The ventilator challenge was an exceptional and far from traditional approach that offers some lessons for future programmes although they could not be applied wholesale under normal circumstances. The ventilator challenge was undoubtedly a significant achievement, involving a huge effort from industry across the UK. In total it produced around 15,000 mechanical ventilators in just four months – around half the number now available to the NHS, and a volume that we understand would normally take years to produce. However, when examining what government can learn from the challenge, it is crucial to keep in mind that the exceptional circumstances in which it took place were, in part, responsible for its success. For example; the clear motivating goal to potentially save thousands of lives encouraged businesses to collaborate and work at pace; and an unusually low emphasis on cost meant that the Cabinet Office could fund the development of multiple devices until it became clear whether the design was viable or was needed to meet demand. Nonetheless, there are clearly some elements of the programme which could be replicable across future government programmes. For example, the NAO pointed to the steps the Cabinet Office took to control costs and its commitment to Covid-19: Supply of ventilators 7 transparency and accountability. Government’s requirement for private companies to collaborate is one example of how Government can use its spending power to improve learning and deliver cost savings and efficiencies. These lessons must be identified and shared more widely. Recommendation: As part of its treasury minute response, the Cabinet Office should work with participants to understand and ensure the right lessons from the ventilator challenge are learnt. It should publicise: • which lessons were unique to the circumstances; • which can be applied to future programmes. It should ensure these lessons are disseminated to the appropriate government departments or functions;