Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 3

53rd Report - Cost of maintaining the FCDO’s overseas estate Published 12 Nov 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
FCDO’s central estate function does not have adequate oversight of estate activities, both at overseas posts and across its project portfolio. Eighty-four percent of overseas posts have responsibility for maintaining their own estate, either through in-house teams or local contractors, with support from the FCDO central estate function in Whitehall. These posts have responsibility for managing their local budgets and can choose what they spend on maintenance, but are not always aware of their estate responsibilities, such as the need to carry out preventative maintenance. As we have highlighted before, most recently in our June 2025 report, Condition of Government property, failure to carry out preventative maintenance is poor value for money as it can mean more expensive emergency works are required later. FCDO plans to publish in October 3 2025 a revised maintenance strategy which will give clearer guidance to posts on their maintenance responsibilities, based on learning drawn from its outsourced facilities management contracts. The central estate function is not able to monitor posts’ maintenance spending and does not have adequate oversight of its project portfolio. FCDO plans to establish a new estates governance board in the autumn, with the aim of bringing together issues of spending, policy, projects and programmes. recommendation FCDO should implement its plans to improve its governance model, including establishing a new estates governance board and publishing a new maintenance strategy for posts. FCDO should update the Committee in its Treasury Minute response on its progress in improving central oversight of its overseas estate.

From: Public Accounts Committee, 53rd Report - Cost of maintaining the FCDO’s overseas estate (HC 884), 12 November 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifty-third Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026 (deadline 12 January 2026).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifth-third report from Session 2024-26

Published 19 January 2026.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states that it "agrees with the Committee's recommendation" on each of the report's recommendations, and reports some as implemented and others with target dates.

  • On estate strategy, the government agrees; an Overseas Network Review fully launching in January 2026 will look at the overall size and shape of the FCDO footprint, and the estates strategy is "due to be updated next in Spring 2026".
  • On the maintenance backlog, the government agrees; the Overseas Estate Department is developing a more robust approach to its annual programme of works, with a target implementation date of end March 2029, and it will write to the Committee within six months categorising buildings by risk.
  • On governance, the government agrees; a new Estates Committee was established in October 2025 and will meet quarterly, and an external review of the operating model and project delivery is due in Spring 2026.
  • On lessons learned from capital projects, the government agrees; the FCDO "is re-establishing a comprehensive lessons-learned process across all capital projects", with a target implementation date of March 2026.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error