Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 15
15
The National Audit Office’s report said that it had been difficult to assess the Superfast...
Conclusion
The National Audit Office’s report said that it had been difficult to assess the Superfast Programme’s performance because it lacked programme-specific measures against which to judge success. It explained that the Department’s coverage targets, for example, to reach 95% of UK premises with superfast broadband infrastructure by 2017, were not specific to the publicly-funded element within the Department’s control and could only be achieved in conjunction with industry-funded roll out.37 We reminded the Department of its target for the UK to be “the best in Europe” and pointed out that the 14% full-fibre coverage and 27% gigabit coverage reported by the National Audit Office put us below the European average.38 The Department said that latest coverage rates for full-fibre and gigabit-capable had increased and were now 17% and 30% respectively.39
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 26 March 2021. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗