Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 26
26
Faced with an unaffordable programme, we questioned the Department’s ability to achieve value for money...
Conclusion
Faced with an unaffordable programme, we questioned the Department’s ability to achieve value for money from its equipment expenditure. We have seen many examples of the Department not buying the quantity of kit or the number of capabilities that it originally intended to buy; such as Typhoons or destroyers.74 The Department acknowledged that, historically, it has bought capabilities with sophisticated rather than utilitarian specifications, although it pointed to the Type 31 acquisition as an example of purchasing a more flexible capability.75 It also acknowledged that in newer domains, such as cyber and space, its procurement procedures are too slow and have not allowed it to respond to the rapid pace of change on new technologies.76
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
3.3 Since the Committee's report, the department published the Defence Command Paper which sets out new policy aims and the capability decisions that were underpinned by the additional £16.5 billion investment from the 2020 Spending Review. The department has taken a balanced approach, with an appropriate level of risk and contingency, investing in the current programme and new capabilities such as space, research and development (R&D) and the Future Combat Air System (FCAS). In doing so, the department has demonstrated that it has the mechanisms in place to deliver a coherent programme and to fund modernisation will disinvest in capabilities such as in the case of Warrior Capability Sustainability Programme (CSP).