Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 4
4
Government chose a centrally-directed system to support clinically vulnerable people as it did not have...
Conclusion
Government chose a centrally-directed system to support clinically vulnerable people as it did not have confidence all local authorities and supermarkets could meet people’s needs, particularly for food. MHCLG spoke with some local authorities and supermarkets early on to assess their capacity, but could not do a full assessment of local authority capacity to support the most vulnerable because of the urgency of the task. Instead, it used the information it had available to have a centrally-directed supply of food boxes which cost £200 million, as this was likely to guarantee a supply of food to every part of England, particularly given its concerns about shortages in supermarkets. However, some local authorities had queried why government chose a centrally-directed rather than a local system of support, particularly for food, and felt that they would have provided better quality support. Starting in April, as confidence grew in the supply chain and as it developed its understanding of local authority capacity, MHCLG moved to a locally-led model which was in place by summer 2020. This model focused on access to supermarket deliveries and having local authorities offer food to suit the needs of the local population where needed. MHCLG calculates that it has provided local authorities some £4.6 billion in un-ring-fenced funding in 2020–21 to help with COVID costs. Recommendation: MHCLG should ensure that local authorities will continue to have the capacity and resilience to support the needs of clinically extremely vulnerable people, particularly given the significant increase of people advised to shield in February 2021 – from 2.2 million to 3.9 million people.
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
agree with the conclusion that a centrally directed system was chosen because of a lack of confidence in local authorities. Councils are crucial partners in delivery of shielding support to clinically extremely vulnerable individuals and since July 2020, councils and supermarkets have been supporting access to food. The shielding framework (co-designed with councils) includes a clear set of expectations regarding delivery of shielding support. From the autumn, the government provided councils with funding at a rate of £14.60 per CEV individual per four weeks whilst Shielding guidance was in place. 4.3 Outcomes data from councils in the most recent period of shielding demonstrated good performance in triaging and meeting requests for support from CEV individuals (including those added in February 2021 as a result of the QCovid® coronavirus risk prediction model). Councils’ confidence in their ability to meet requests for support consistently remained high. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) also tracked spend patterns, which will inform future review of funding. 4.4 Shielding was paused on 1 April 2021. As part of contingency planning, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has tested future delivery confidence with nearly all upper tier councils across England, finding that councils are confident in their ability to stand up shielding support rapidly in future. MHCLG continues to work closely with councils and to keep funding under review so councils can support those who need it, whilst providing value for money.