Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 24
64th Report - Costs of clinical negligence
Published 30 Jan 2026
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Costs of clinical negligence All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The previous government announced plans to place limits on how much lawyers receive from lower damages clinical negligence claims of under £25,000 where 85% of cases fall within this category from April 2024, but 51 Q 50 52 C&AG’s Report, paras 2.12-2.13 53 Q 64 54 Q 67 55 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.12, 3.13 56 Q 64 57 Fletchers Solicitors (CCN0013); Switalskis Solicitors (CCN0014) 58 C&AG’s Report, paras 12, 2.16 59 Q 60 16 the required legislation was not introduced.60 We understand the Civil Rules Committee has put all its work on hold and there is no ongoing work in this area. Critics of these plans have raised concerns that they would impact access to justice for legitimate victims of clinical negligence.61 NHS Resolution agreed that access to justice for people who are severely harmed but who may have a low-value claim is an important consideration that needs to be part of decision making.62 The Department told us options to reduce legal costs in low-value cases form part of the ongoing review by David Lock KC.63 Assumptions around private care
From: Public Accounts Committee, 64th Report - Costs of clinical negligence (HC 1234), 30 January 2026
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 7 April 2026 (deadline 30 March 2026).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government agrees with the Committee's recommendation to set out an operational plan on clinical negligence, disagrees with others, and has some recommendations "under consideration".
- It agrees to write to the Committee "by this Autumn" with its workplan, key milestones and likely areas of focus for reform, but "disagrees" with publishing David Lock KC's review, saying it has "no current plans" to publish a separate report.
- It "disagrees" with estimating and tracking the costs of treating avoidable harm, stating it "would not be financially or logistically feasible", and "disagrees" with a new national data-sharing system, saying "there is already data sharing arrangements in place".
- On maternity, it agrees with the recommendation to learn lessons. Baroness Amos has confirmed the independent investigation will publish its final report in June 2026, and a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce will develop a national action plan.
- Alternative dispute mechanisms and fixed recoverable costs are "under consideration", and the government is "unable to commit" to the six-month timeframe for double recovery estimates. It will write to the Committee by Autumn 2026 on each.